AMD Radeon HD 8750M vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 8750M and NVIDIA Quadro 2000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8750M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 2 month(s) later
• 2x more pipelines: 384 vs 192
• Around 24% better floating-point performance: 595.2 gflops vs 480.0 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
• Around 54% higher memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 2600 MHz
• Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1014 vs 947
• Around 51% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5864 vs 3876
• Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 271.177 vs 258.26
• Around 70% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.505 vs 0.885
• Around 81% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 24.834 vs 13.688
• 3.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 70.596 vs 19.02
• Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1734 vs 1600
• Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2221 vs 1682
• Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3351 vs 2668
• Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1734 vs 1600
• Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2221 vs 1682
• Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3351 vs 2668

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 2000

• Around 1% higher core clock speed: 625 MHz vs 620 MHz
• Around 8% higher texture fill rate: 20 GTexel / s vs 18.6 GTexel / s
• Around 50% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 302 vs 202
• Around 24% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 10.229 vs 8.274

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 8750M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 2000

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1014 947
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	202 302
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	5864 3876
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8.274 10.229
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	271.177 258.26
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.505 0.885
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	24.834 13.688
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	70.596 19.02
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1734 1600
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2221 1682
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3351 2668
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1734 1600
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2221 1682
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3351 2668

Compare specifications (specs)