NVIDIA Quadro 2000D vs ATI Radeon 9550
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro 2000D and ATI Radeon 9550 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 2000D
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- 2.5x more core clock speed: 625 MHz vs 250 MHz
- 20x more texture fill rate: 20 GTexel / s vs 1 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 130 nm
- 16x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 64 MB
- 6.5x more memory clock speed: 2600 MHz vs 400 MHz
- 27.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 978 vs 35
- 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 326 vs 145
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 5 October 2011 vs 1 October 2003 |
Core clock speed | 625 MHz vs 250 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 20 GTexel / s vs 1 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 130 nm |
Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 64 MB |
Memory clock speed | 2600 MHz vs 400 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 978 vs 35 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 326 vs 145 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro 2000D
GPU 2: ATI Radeon 9550
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro 2000D | ATI Radeon 9550 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 978 | 35 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 326 | 145 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3925 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 11.122 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 320.57 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.67 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 31.168 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1453 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3447 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1453 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3447 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro 2000D | ATI Radeon 9550 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi | Rage 8 |
Code name | GF106 | RV350 |
Launch date | 5 October 2011 | 1 October 2003 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $599 | |
Place in performance rating | 1134 | 1136 |
Price now | $209 | |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 7.27 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 625 MHz | 250 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 480.0 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 130 nm |
Pipelines | 192 | |
Texture fill rate | 20 GTexel / s | 1 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 62 Watt | |
Transistor count | 1,170 million | 76 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2x DVI | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | AGP 8x |
Length | 178 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 9.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.0 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 64 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 41.6 GB / s | 6.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2600 MHz | 400 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR |