AMD FirePro W5130M vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000D

Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro W5130M and NVIDIA Quadro 2000D videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W5130M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 11 month(s) later
• Around 44% higher core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 625 MHz
• Around 48% higher texture fill rate: 29.6 GTexel / s vs 20 GTexel / s
• 2.7x more pipelines: 512 vs 192
• Around 97% better floating-point performance: 947.2 gflops vs 480.0 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
• Around 54% higher memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 2600 MHz
• Around 44% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1405 vs 976
• Around 32% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5198 vs 3930
• 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 22.588 vs 11.122
• Around 58% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 505.57 vs 320.57
• 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 30.114 vs 12.67
• 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 89.784 vs 31.168
• Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1879 vs 1453
• Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1879 vs 1453

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 2000D

• Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 323 vs 302
• Around 65% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3447 vs 2090
• Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 vs 2582
• Around 65% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3447 vs 2090
• Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 vs 2582

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD FirePro W5130M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 2000D

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1405 976
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	302 323
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	5198 3930
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	22.588 11.122
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	505.57 320.57
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	30.114 12.67
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	89.784 31.168
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1879 1453
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2090 3447
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2582 3353
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1879 1453
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2090 3447
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2582 3353

Compare specifications (specs)