NVIDIA Quadro 2000D vs ATI FireMV 2200 PCI
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro 2000D and ATI FireMV 2200 PCI videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 2000D
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- 2.6x more core clock speed: 625 MHz vs 240 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 150 nm
- 16x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 64 MB
- 6.5x more memory clock speed: 2600 MHz vs 400 MHz
- 976x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 976 vs 1
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 323 vs 153
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 5 October 2011 vs 1 January 2006 |
Core clock speed | 625 MHz vs 240 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 150 nm |
Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 64 MB |
Memory clock speed | 2600 MHz vs 400 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 976 vs 1 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 323 vs 153 |
Reasons to consider the ATI FireMV 2200 PCI
- 48x more texture fill rate: 960 MTexel / s vs 20 GTexel / s
- 4.1x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 62 Watt
Texture fill rate | 960 MTexel / s vs 20 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 62 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro 2000D
GPU 2: ATI FireMV 2200 PCI
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro 2000D | ATI FireMV 2200 PCI |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 976 | 1 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 323 | 153 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3930 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 11.122 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 320.57 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.67 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 31.168 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1453 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3447 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1453 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3447 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro 2000D | ATI FireMV 2200 PCI | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi | Rage 7 |
Code name | GF106 | RV280 |
Launch date | 5 October 2011 | 1 January 2006 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $599 | |
Place in performance rating | 1115 | 1118 |
Price now | $209 | |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 7.27 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 625 MHz | 240 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 480.0 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 150 nm |
Pipelines | 192 | |
Texture fill rate | 20 GTexel / s | 960 MTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 62 Watt | 15 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,170 million | 36 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2x DVI | 1x DMS-59 |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCI |
Length | 178 mm | 170 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 8.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 1.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 64 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 41.6 GB / s | 3.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2600 MHz | 400 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR |