NVIDIA Quadro 3000M vs NVIDIA GeForce 7900 GS
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro 3000M and NVIDIA GeForce 7900 GS videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- 2x more texture fill rate: 18 GTexel / s vs 9 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 90 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 256 MB
- Around 89% higher memory clock speed: 2500 MHz vs 1320 MHz
- 3.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 998 vs 254
- 4.6x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 316 vs 68
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 22 February 2011 vs 1 May 2006 |
Texture fill rate | 18 GTexel / s vs 9 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 90 nm |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 256 MB |
Memory clock speed | 2500 MHz vs 1320 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 998 vs 254 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 316 vs 68 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 7900 GS
- Around 53% lower typical power consumption: 49 Watt vs 75 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 49 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 7900 GS
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro 3000M | NVIDIA GeForce 7900 GS |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 998 | 254 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 316 | 68 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3783 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.95 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 325.007 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.865 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 13.794 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 27.961 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 218 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 374 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 543 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 218 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 374 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 543 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro 3000M | NVIDIA GeForce 7900 GS | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi | Curie |
Code name | GF104 | G71 |
Launch date | 22 February 2011 | 1 May 2006 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $398.96 | $259 |
Place in performance rating | 1493 | 1496 |
Price now | $199.95 | |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 7.98 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 450 MHz | 450 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 432.0 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 90 nm |
Pipelines | 240 | |
Texture fill rate | 18 GTexel / s | 9 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 49 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,950 million | 278 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
Length | 198 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 9.0c |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 256 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 80.0 GB / s | 42.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2500 MHz | 1320 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 |