AMD Radeon HD 7470 OEM vs NVIDIA Quadro 3000M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 7470 OEM and NVIDIA Quadro 3000M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7470 OEM

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 10 month(s) later
  • Around 67% higher core clock speed: 750 MHz vs 450 MHz
  • 2.8x lower typical power consumption: 27 Watt vs 75 Watt
  • Around 44% higher memory clock speed: 3600 MHz vs 2500 MHz
  • 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 540 vs 218
  • 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1044 vs 374
  • 3.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1702 vs 543
  • 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 540 vs 218
  • 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1044 vs 374
  • 3.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1702 vs 543
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 5 January 2012 vs 22 February 2011
Core clock speed 750 MHz vs 450 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 27 Watt vs 75 Watt
Memory clock speed 3600 MHz vs 2500 MHz
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 540 vs 218
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1044 vs 374
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1702 vs 543
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 540 vs 218
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1044 vs 374
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1702 vs 543

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 3000M

  • 3x more texture fill rate: 18 GTexel / s vs 6 GTexel / s
  • Around 50% higher pipelines: 240 vs 160
  • Around 80% better floating-point performance: 432.0 gflops vs 240.0 gflops
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
  • 3.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 994 vs 289
  • 2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 310 vs 152
  • 4.8x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3807 vs 791
Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate 18 GTexel / s vs 6 GTexel / s
Pipelines 240 vs 160
Floating-point performance 432.0 gflops vs 240.0 gflops
Maximum memory size 2 GB vs 1 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 994 vs 289
PassMark - G2D Mark 310 vs 152
Geekbench - OpenCL 3807 vs 791

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 7470 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 3000M

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
289
994
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
152
310
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
791
3807
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
540
218
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1044
374
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1702
543
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
540
218
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1044
374
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1702
543
Name AMD Radeon HD 7470 OEM NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
PassMark - G3D Mark 289 994
PassMark - G2D Mark 152 310
Geekbench - OpenCL 791 3807
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 540 218
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1044 374
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1702 543
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 540 218
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1044 374
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1702 543
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 437
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 10.95
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 325.007
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.865
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 13.794
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 27.961

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon HD 7470 OEM NVIDIA Quadro 3000M

Essentials

Architecture TeraScale 2 Fermi
Code name Caicos GF104
Launch date 5 January 2012 22 February 2011
Place in performance rating 1499 1500
Type Desktop Mobile workstation
Launch price (MSRP) $398.96
Price now $199.95
Value for money (0-100) 7.98

Technical info

Core clock speed 750 MHz 450 MHz
Floating-point performance 240.0 gflops 432.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 40 nm 40 nm
Pipelines 160 240
Texture fill rate 6 GTexel / s 18 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 27 Watt 75 Watt
Transistor count 370 million 1,950 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 2.0 x16 MXM-B (3.0)
Length 168 mm
Supplementary power connectors None
Laptop size large

API support

DirectX 11.2 (11_0) 12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.4 4.6

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 28.8 GB / s 80.0 GB / s
Memory bus width 64 Bit 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 3600 MHz 2500 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
Shared memory 0