AMD Radeon HD 7470 OEM vs NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 7470 OEM and NVIDIA Quadro 3000M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7470 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 10 month(s) later
- Around 67% higher core clock speed: 750 MHz vs 450 MHz
- 2.8x lower typical power consumption: 27 Watt vs 75 Watt
- Around 44% higher memory clock speed: 3600 MHz vs 2500 MHz
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 540 vs 218
- 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1044 vs 374
- 3.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1702 vs 543
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 540 vs 218
- 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1044 vs 374
- 3.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1702 vs 543
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 5 January 2012 vs 22 February 2011 |
Core clock speed | 750 MHz vs 450 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 27 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz vs 2500 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 540 vs 218 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1044 vs 374 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1702 vs 543 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 540 vs 218 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1044 vs 374 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1702 vs 543 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
- 3x more texture fill rate: 18 GTexel / s vs 6 GTexel / s
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 240 vs 160
- Around 80% better floating-point performance: 432.0 gflops vs 240.0 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- 3.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 995 vs 289
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 312 vs 152
- 4.8x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3798 vs 791
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 18 GTexel / s vs 6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 240 vs 160 |
Floating-point performance | 432.0 gflops vs 240.0 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 995 vs 289 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 312 vs 152 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3798 vs 791 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 7470 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon HD 7470 OEM | NVIDIA Quadro 3000M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 289 | 995 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 152 | 312 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 791 | 3798 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 540 | 218 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1044 | 374 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1702 | 543 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 540 | 218 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1044 | 374 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1702 | 543 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 437 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.95 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 325.007 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.865 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 13.794 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 27.961 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon HD 7470 OEM | NVIDIA Quadro 3000M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Fermi |
Code name | Caicos | GF104 |
Launch date | 5 January 2012 | 22 February 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 1499 | 1500 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $398.96 | |
Price now | $199.95 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 7.98 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 750 MHz | 450 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 240.0 gflops | 432.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 160 | 240 |
Texture fill rate | 6 GTexel / s | 18 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 27 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 370 million | 1,950 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Length | 168 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB / s | 80.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz | 2500 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 |