NVIDIA Quadro 400 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9400
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro 400 and NVIDIA GeForce 9400 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 400
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 80 nm
- Around 25% lower typical power consumption: 32 Watt vs 40 Watt
- Around 49% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 148 vs 99
- Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1103 vs 800
- Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1103 vs 800
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 5 April 2011 vs 17 April 2007 |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 80 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 32 Watt vs 40 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 148 vs 99 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1103 vs 800 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1103 vs 800 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9400
- Around 29% higher core clock speed: 580 MHz vs 450 MHz
- Around 22% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 72 vs 59
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 580 MHz vs 450 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 72 vs 59 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro 400
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9400
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro 400 | NVIDIA GeForce 9400 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 148 | 99 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 59 | 72 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4630 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1103 | 800 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1103 | 800 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro 400 | NVIDIA GeForce 9400 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Tesla |
Code name | GT216 | MCP7A |
Launch date | 5 April 2011 | 17 April 2007 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $169 | |
Place in performance rating | 1608 | 1605 |
Price now | $145.55 | |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 2.13 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 450 MHz | 580 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 108 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 80 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | |
Texture fill rate | 7.2 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 32 Watt | 40 Watt |
Transistor count | 486 million | 210 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCI |
Length | 163 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.1 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | |
Memory bandwidth | 12.32 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1540 MHz | |
Memory type | DDR3 |