NVIDIA Quadro 410 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GS

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro 410 and NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GS videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

NVIDIA Quadro 410

NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GS

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 410

Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 9 month(s) later
Around 33% higher core clock speed: 706 MHz vs 530 MHz
3x more pipelines: 192 vs 64
Around 60% better floating-point performance: 271.1 gflops vs 169.6 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 65 nm
Around 58% lower typical power consumption: 38 Watt vs 60 Watt
Around 11% higher memory clock speed: 1782 MHz vs 1600 MHz
3.9x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 221 vs 57

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	7 August 2012 vs 1 November 2008
Core clock speed	706 MHz vs 530 MHz
Pipelines	192 vs 64
Floating-point performance	271.1 gflops vs 169.6 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm vs 65 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	38 Watt vs 60 Watt
Memory clock speed	1782 MHz vs 1600 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	221 vs 57

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GS

Around 42% higher texture fill rate: 16 billion / sec vs 11.3 GTexel / s
Around 26% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 555 vs 441
Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2414 vs 1794
Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2414 vs 1794

Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate	16 billion / sec vs 11.3 GTexel / s
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	555 vs 441
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	2414 vs 1794
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	2414 vs 1794

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro 410
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GS

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

441

555

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

221

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1794

2414

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1794

2414

Name	NVIDIA Quadro 410	NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GS
PassMark - G3D Mark	441	555
PassMark - G2D Mark	221	57
Geekbench - OpenCL	1446
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	5.393
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	126.006
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	5.685
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	8.847
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	919
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1311
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	1794	2414
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	919
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1311
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	1794	2414

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro 410	NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GS
Essentials
Architecture	Kepler	Tesla
Code name	GK107	G94
Launch date	7 August 2012	1 November 2008
Launch price (MSRP)	$149
Place in performance rating	1457	1461
Price now	$272.28
Type	Workstation	Laptop
Value for money (0-100)	1.70
Technical info
Core clock speed	706 MHz	530 MHz
Floating-point performance	271.1 gflops	169.6 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	65 nm
Pipelines	192	64
Texture fill rate	11.3 GTexel / s	16 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	38 Watt	60 Watt
Transistor count	1,270 million	505 million
CUDA cores		64
Gigaflops		254
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort	No outputs
Maximum VGA resolution		2048x1536
Multi monitor support
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	176 mm
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
Bus support		PCI-E 2.0
Laptop size		large
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_0)	10.0
OpenGL	4.6	2.1
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	512 MB
Memory bandwidth	14.26 GB / s	51.2 GB / s
Memory bus width	64 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1782 MHz	1600 MHz
Memory type	DDR3	GDDR3
Shared memory		0
Technologies
CUDA
Power management		8.0