Intel HD Graphics 5300 vs NVIDIA Quadro 410
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 5300 and NVIDIA Quadro 410 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 5300
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 38 Watt
- Around 2% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 1468 vs 1446
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 5 September 2014 vs 7 August 2012 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 38 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1468 vs 1446 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 410
- 7.1x more core clock speed: 706 MHz vs 100 MHz
- 8x more pipelines: 192 vs 24
- Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 438 vs 400
- Around 21% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 219 vs 181
- Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 919 vs 709
- Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 919 vs 709
- Around 89% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1311 vs 693
- Around 89% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1311 vs 693
- Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1794 vs 1627
- Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1794 vs 1627
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 706 MHz vs 100 MHz |
Pipelines | 192 vs 24 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 438 vs 400 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 219 vs 181 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 919 vs 709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 919 vs 709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1311 vs 693 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1311 vs 693 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1794 vs 1627 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1794 vs 1627 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 5300
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 410
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel HD Graphics 5300 | NVIDIA Quadro 410 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 400 | 438 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 181 | 219 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1468 | 1446 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 709 | 919 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 709 | 919 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 693 | 1311 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 693 | 1311 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1627 | 1794 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1627 | 1794 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 5.393 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 126.006 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 5.685 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 8.847 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel HD Graphics 5300 | NVIDIA Quadro 410 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 8.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Broadwell GT2 | GK107 |
Launch date | 5 September 2014 | 7 August 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 1458 | 1461 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $149 | |
Price now | $272.28 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 1.70 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 900 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 100 MHz | 706 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 24 | 192 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 38 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,300 million | 1,270 million |
Floating-point performance | 271.1 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 11.3 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 176 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | |
Memory bandwidth | 14.26 GB / s | |
Memory clock speed | 1782 MHz | |
Memory type | DDR3 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |