Intel HD Graphics 5300 vs NVIDIA Quadro 410

Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 5300 and NVIDIA Quadro 410 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 5300

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 0 month(s) later
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
  • 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 38 Watt
  • Around 2% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 1470 vs 1446
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 5 September 2014 vs 7 August 2012
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt vs 38 Watt
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 1470 vs 1446

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 410

  • 7.1x more core clock speed: 706 MHz vs 100 MHz
  • 8x more pipelines: 192 vs 24
  • Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 438 vs 401
  • Around 21% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 219 vs 181
  • Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 919 vs 709
  • Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 919 vs 709
  • Around 89% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1311 vs 693
  • Around 89% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1311 vs 693
  • Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1794 vs 1627
  • Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1794 vs 1627
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 706 MHz vs 100 MHz
Pipelines 192 vs 24
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 438 vs 401
PassMark - G2D Mark 219 vs 181
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 919 vs 709
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 919 vs 709
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1311 vs 693
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1311 vs 693
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1794 vs 1627
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1794 vs 1627

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 5300
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 410

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
401
438
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
181
219
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
1470
1446
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
709
919
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
709
919
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
693
1311
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
693
1311
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1627
1794
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1627
1794
Name Intel HD Graphics 5300 NVIDIA Quadro 410
PassMark - G3D Mark 401 438
PassMark - G2D Mark 181 219
Geekbench - OpenCL 1470 1446
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 709 919
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 709 919
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 693 1311
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 693 1311
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1627 1794
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1627 1794
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 5.393
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 126.006
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 5.685
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 8.847

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel HD Graphics 5300 NVIDIA Quadro 410

Essentials

Architecture Generation 8.0 Kepler
Code name Broadwell GT2 GK107
Launch date 5 September 2014 7 August 2012
Place in performance rating 1458 1461
Type Laptop Workstation
Launch price (MSRP) $149
Price now $272.28
Value for money (0-100) 1.70

Technical info

Boost clock speed 900 MHz
Core clock speed 100 MHz 706 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 24 192
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt 38 Watt
Transistor count 1,300 million 1,270 million
Floating-point performance 271.1 gflops
Texture fill rate 11.3 GTexel / s

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 2.0 x1 PCIe 2.0 x16
Length 176 mm
Supplementary power connectors None

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_1) 12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.6 4.6

Memory

Memory bus width 64 / 128 Bit 64 Bit
Shared memory 1
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB
Memory bandwidth 14.26 GB / s
Memory clock speed 1782 MHz
Memory type DDR3

Technologies

Quick Sync