NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition vs NVIDIA Quadro 410

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition and NVIDIA Quadro 410 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 3 month(s) later
• Around 31% higher core clock speed: 926 MHz vs 706 MHz
• 2.6x more texture fill rate: 29.63 GTexel / s vs 11.3 GTexel / s
• 2x more pipelines: 384 vs 192
• 2.6x better floating-point performance: 711.2 gflops vs 271.1 gflops
• 4x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 512 MB
• 2.8x more memory clock speed: 5016 MHz vs 1782 MHz
• Around 94% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 10.451 vs 5.393
• 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 370.814 vs 126.006
• 3.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 20.902 vs 5.685
• 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 22.557 vs 8.847
• 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2483 vs 919
• 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3406 vs 1311
• 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4045 vs 1794

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 410

• Around 32% lower typical power consumption: 38 Watt vs 50 Watt
• 21.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 919 vs 42
• 23.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1311 vs 55
• 24.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1794 vs 72.2

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 410

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10.451 5.393
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	370.814 126.006
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	20.902 5.685
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	22.557 8.847
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2483 919
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3406 1311
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4045 1794
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	42 919
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	55 1311
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	72.2 1794

Compare specifications (specs)