NVIDIA Quadro 5010M vs ATI FireMV 2400 PCIe x1
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro 5010M and ATI FireMV 2400 PCIe x1 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 5010M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- 10.8x more texture fill rate: 21.6 GTexel / s vs 2 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 130 nm
- 16x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 256 MB
- 2.6x more memory clock speed: 2600 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- 153.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1691 vs 11
- Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 297 vs 283
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 22 February 2011 vs 1 January 2008 |
Texture fill rate | 21.6 GTexel / s vs 2 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 130 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 256 MB |
Memory clock speed | 2600 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1691 vs 11 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 297 vs 283 |
Reasons to consider the ATI FireMV 2400 PCIe x1
- Around 11% higher core clock speed: 500 MHz vs 450 MHz
- 5x lower typical power consumption: 20 Watt vs 100 Watt
Core clock speed | 500 MHz vs 450 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt vs 100 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro 5010M
GPU 2: ATI FireMV 2400 PCIe x1
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro 5010M | ATI FireMV 2400 PCIe x1 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1691 | 11 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 297 | 283 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 16261 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro 5010M | ATI FireMV 2400 PCIe x1 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Rage 9 |
Code name | GF110 | RV380 |
Launch date | 22 February 2011 | 1 January 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 619 | 621 |
Price now | $235.95 | |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 10.17 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 450 MHz | 500 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 691.2 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 130 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | |
Texture fill rate | 21.6 GTexel / s | 2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 20 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,000 million | 75 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x VHDCI |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x1 |
Laptop size | large | |
Length | 170 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 9.0b |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.0 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 256 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 83.2 GB / s | 16 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2600 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 ECC | DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
ECC (Error Correcting Code) |