NVIDIA Quadro 5010M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro 5010M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 5010M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
- 2.4x lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 244 Watt
- 2.7x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1536 MB
- Around 30% higher memory clock speed: 2600 MHz vs 2004 MHz (4008 data rate)
- Around 7% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 16261 vs 15182
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 22 February 2011 vs 9 November 2010 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt vs 244 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1536 MB |
Memory clock speed | 2600 MHz vs 2004 MHz (4008 data rate) |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 16261 vs 15182 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580
- 3.4x more core clock speed: 1544 MHz vs 450 MHz
- 2.3x more texture fill rate: 49.4 billion / sec vs 21.6 GTexel / s
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 512 vs 384
- 2.3x better floating-point performance: 1,581.1 gflops vs 691.2 gflops
- 2.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4630 vs 1691
- Around 65% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 490 vs 297
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1544 MHz vs 450 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 49.4 billion / sec vs 21.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 512 vs 384 |
Floating-point performance | 1,581.1 gflops vs 691.2 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4630 vs 1691 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 490 vs 297 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro 5010M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro 5010M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1691 | 4630 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 297 | 490 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 16261 | 15182 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 40.048 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 872.651 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.338 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 32.378 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 132.363 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5953 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5953 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 809 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro 5010M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
Code name | GF110 | GF110 |
Launch date | 22 February 2011 | 9 November 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 619 | 620 |
Price now | $235.95 | $289.88 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 10.17 | 19.21 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $499 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 450 MHz | 1544 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 691.2 gflops | 1,581.1 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 512 |
Texture fill rate | 21.6 GTexel / s | 49.4 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 244 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,000 million | 3,000 million |
CUDA cores | 512 | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | Mini HDMITwo Dual Link DVI, 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 x 16 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
SLI options | 3-way | |
Supplementary power connectors | One 6-pin and One 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.2 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1536 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 83.2 GB / s | 192.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2600 MHz | 2004 MHz (4008 data rate) |
Memory type | GDDR5 ECC | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
ECC (Error Correcting Code) | ||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
DSR | ||
SLI | ||
Surround |