NVIDIA Quadro 5010M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro 5010M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 5010M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
- 2.4x lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 244 Watt
- 2.7x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1536 MB
- Around 30% higher memory clock speed: 2600 MHz vs 2004 MHz (4008 data rate)
- Around 7% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 16261 vs 15182
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 22 February 2011 vs 9 November 2010 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt vs 244 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1536 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 2600 MHz vs 2004 MHz (4008 data rate) |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 16261 vs 15182 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580
- 3.4x more core clock speed: 1544 MHz vs 450 MHz
- 2.3x more texture fill rate: 49.4 billion / sec vs 21.6 GTexel / s
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 512 vs 384
- 2.3x better floating-point performance: 1,581.1 gflops vs 691.2 gflops
- 2.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4630 vs 1691
- Around 65% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 490 vs 297
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1544 MHz vs 450 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 49.4 billion / sec vs 21.6 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 512 vs 384 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,581.1 gflops vs 691.2 gflops |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4630 vs 1691 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 490 vs 297 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro 5010M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro 5010M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1691 | 4630 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 297 | 490 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 16261 | 15182 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 40.048 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 872.651 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.338 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 32.378 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 132.363 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5953 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5953 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 809 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro 5010M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
| Code name | GF110 | GF110 |
| Launch date | 22 February 2011 | 9 November 2010 |
| Place in performance rating | 619 | 620 |
| Price now | $235.95 | $289.88 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 10.17 | 19.21 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $499 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 450 MHz | 1544 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 691.2 gflops | 1,581.1 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 512 |
| Texture fill rate | 21.6 GTexel / s | 49.4 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 244 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3,000 million | 3,000 million |
| CUDA cores | 512 | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | Mini HDMITwo Dual Link DVI, 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 x 16 | |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
| SLI options | 3-way | |
| Supplementary power connectors | One 6-pin and One 8-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.2 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1536 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 83.2 GB / s | 192.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2600 MHz | 2004 MHz (4008 data rate) |
| Memory type | GDDR5 ECC | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| ECC (Error Correcting Code) | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DSR | ||
| SLI | ||
| Surround | ||

