NVIDIA Quadro 5010M vs ATI Radeon X1600 PRO
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro 5010M and ATI Radeon X1600 PRO videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 5010M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- 10.8x more texture fill rate: 21.6 GTexel / s vs 2 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 90 nm
- 16x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 256 MB
- 3.3x more memory clock speed: 2600 MHz vs 780 MHz
- 17.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1691 vs 99
- Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 297 vs 273
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 22 February 2011 vs 1 October 2007 |
Texture fill rate | 21.6 GTexel / s vs 2 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 90 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 256 MB |
Memory clock speed | 2600 MHz vs 780 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1691 vs 99 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 297 vs 273 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon X1600 PRO
- Around 11% higher core clock speed: 500 MHz vs 450 MHz
- 2.4x lower typical power consumption: 41 Watt vs 100 Watt
Core clock speed | 500 MHz vs 450 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 41 Watt vs 100 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro 5010M
GPU 2: ATI Radeon X1600 PRO
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro 5010M | ATI Radeon X1600 PRO |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1691 | 99 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 297 | 273 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 16261 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro 5010M | ATI Radeon X1600 PRO | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | R500 |
Code name | GF110 | RV530 |
Launch date | 22 February 2011 | 1 October 2007 |
Place in performance rating | 605 | 606 |
Price now | $235.95 | |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 10.17 | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $199 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 450 MHz | 500 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 691.2 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 90 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | |
Texture fill rate | 21.6 GTexel / s | 2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 41 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,000 million | 157 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 9.0c |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.0 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 256 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 83.2 GB / s | 12.48 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2600 MHz | 780 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 ECC | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
ECC (Error Correcting Code) |