NVIDIA Quadro 5010M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1300
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro 5010M and NVIDIA Quadro FX 1300 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 5010M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 29% higher core clock speed: 450 MHz vs 350 MHz
- 7.7x more texture fill rate: 21.6 GTexel / s vs 2.8 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 130 nm
- 32x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 128 MB
- 4.7x more memory clock speed: 2600 MHz vs 550 MHz
- 49.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1691 vs 34
- Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 297 vs 276
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 22 February 2011 vs 9 August 2004 |
Core clock speed | 450 MHz vs 350 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 21.6 GTexel / s vs 2.8 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 130 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 128 MB |
Memory clock speed | 2600 MHz vs 550 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1691 vs 34 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 297 vs 276 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 1300
- Around 82% lower typical power consumption: 55 Watt vs 100 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt vs 100 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro 5010M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 1300
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro 5010M | NVIDIA Quadro FX 1300 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1691 | 34 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 297 | 276 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 16261 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro 5010M | NVIDIA Quadro FX 1300 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Rankine |
Code name | GF110 | NV38 A1 |
Launch date | 22 February 2011 | 9 August 2004 |
Place in performance rating | 605 | 608 |
Price now | $235.95 | |
Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 10.17 | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $599 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 450 MHz | 350 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 691.2 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 130 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | |
Texture fill rate | 21.6 GTexel / s | 2.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 55 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,000 million | 135 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
Length | 241 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 9.0a |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 128 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 83.2 GB / s | 8.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2600 MHz | 550 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 ECC | DDR |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
ECC (Error Correcting Code) |