NVIDIA Quadro FX 350M vs ATI Radeon 9800 SE
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro FX 350M and ATI Radeon 9800 SE videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 350M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 36% higher core clock speed: 450 MHz vs 331 MHz
- Around 36% higher texture fill rate: 1.8 GTexel / s vs 1.324 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 90 nm vs 150 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 256 MB vs 128 MB
- Around 55% higher memory clock speed: 900 MHz vs 580 MHz
- Around 88% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 45 vs 24
- Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 132 vs 131
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 13 March 2006 vs 1 March 2003 |
Core clock speed | 450 MHz vs 331 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 1.8 GTexel / s vs 1.324 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 90 nm vs 150 nm |
Maximum memory size | 256 MB vs 128 MB |
Memory clock speed | 900 MHz vs 580 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 45 vs 24 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 132 vs 131 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro FX 350M
GPU 2: ATI Radeon 9800 SE
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro FX 350M | ATI Radeon 9800 SE |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 45 | 24 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 132 | 131 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro FX 350M | ATI Radeon 9800 SE | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Curie | Rage 8 |
Code name | G72 | R350 |
Launch date | 13 March 2006 | 1 March 2003 |
Place in performance rating | 1199 | 1201 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 450 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 450 MHz | 331 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 90 nm | 150 nm |
Pipelines | 4 | |
Texture fill rate | 1.8 GTexel / s | 1.324 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
Transistor count | 112 million | 117 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | AGP 8x |
Supplementary power connectors | Floppy | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 9.0c | 9.0 |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 2.0 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | 128 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 9.28 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 350 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 900 MHz | 580 MHz |
Memory type | 64 | DDR |
Shared memory | no | |
Technologies |
||
CineFX 4.0 | ||
Intellisample 4.0 | ||
PowerMizer 6.0 | ||
UltraShadow II |