NVIDIA Quadro FX 5800 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 350M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro FX 5800 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 350M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 5800
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 36% higher core clock speed: 610 MHz vs 450 MHz
- 27.1x more texture fill rate: 48.8 GTexel / s vs 1.8 GTexel / s
- 60x more pipelines: 240 vs 4
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 55 nm vs 90 nm
- 16x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 256 MB
- Around 78% higher memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 900 MHz
- 27.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1223 vs 45
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 11 November 2008 vs 13 March 2006 |
Core clock speed | 610 MHz vs 450 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 48.8 GTexel / s vs 1.8 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 240 vs 4 |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm vs 90 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 256 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz vs 900 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1223 vs 45 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 350M
- 12.6x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 189 Watt
- Around 33% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 132 vs 99
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 189 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 132 vs 99 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro FX 5800
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 350M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro FX 5800 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 350M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1223 | 45 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 99 | 132 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 18229 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3319 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3319 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro FX 5800 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 350M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Curie |
Code name | GT200B | G72 |
Launch date | 11 November 2008 | 13 March 2006 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $3,499 | |
Place in performance rating | 1196 | 1199 |
Price now | $178.89 | |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 8.02 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 610 MHz | 450 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 622.1 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 90 nm |
Pipelines | 240 | 4 |
Texture fill rate | 48.8 GTexel / s | 1.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 189 Watt | 15 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | 112 million |
Boost clock speed | 450 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 9.0c |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 256 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 102.4 GB / s | 14.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 512 Bit | 350 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 900 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR3 | 64 |
Shared memory | no | |
Technologies |
||
CineFX 4.0 | ||
Intellisample 4.0 | ||
PowerMizer 6.0 | ||
UltraShadow II |