AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 350M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM and NVIDIA Quadro FX 350M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM

NVIDIA Quadro FX 350M

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM

Videocard is newer: launch date 10 year(s) 3 month(s) later
Around 62% higher core clock speed: 730 MHz vs 450 MHz
Around 73% higher boost clock speed: 780 MHz vs 450 MHz
10.4x more texture fill rate: 18.72 GTexel / s vs 1.8 GTexel / s
96x more pipelines: 384 vs 4
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 90 nm
8x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 256 MB
2x more memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 900 MHz
20.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 921 vs 45
2.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 304 vs 132

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	30 June 2016 vs 13 March 2006
Core clock speed	730 MHz vs 450 MHz
Boost clock speed	780 MHz vs 450 MHz
Texture fill rate	18.72 GTexel / s vs 1.8 GTexel / s
Pipelines	384 vs 4
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm vs 90 nm
Maximum memory size	2 GB vs 256 MB
Memory clock speed	1800 MHz vs 900 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	921 vs 45
PassMark - G2D Mark	304 vs 132

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 350M

3.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 50 Watt

Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt vs 50 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 350M

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

921

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

304

132

Name	AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM	NVIDIA Quadro FX 350M
PassMark - G3D Mark	921	45
PassMark - G2D Mark	304	132
Geekbench - OpenCL	5827
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	12.111
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	253.178
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	1.211
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	23.777
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	73.506
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1645
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2426
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	1677
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1645
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2426
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	1677

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM	NVIDIA Quadro FX 350M
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Curie
Code name	Oland	G72
Launch date	30 June 2016	13 March 2006
Place in performance rating	1202	1199
Type	Desktop	Mobile workstation
Technical info
Boost clock speed	780 MHz	450 MHz
Core clock speed	730 MHz	450 MHz
Floating-point performance	599.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	90 nm
Pipelines	384	4
Texture fill rate	18.72 GTexel / s	1.8 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	50 Watt	15 Watt
Transistor count	1,040 million	112 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 1.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_1)	9.0c
OpenGL	4.5	2.1
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	256 MB
Memory bandwidth	28.8 GB / s	14.4 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	350 Bit
Memory clock speed	1800 MHz	900 MHz
Memory type	DDR3	64
Shared memory		no
Technologies
CineFX 4.0
Intellisample 4.0
PowerMizer 6.0
UltraShadow II