NVIDIA Quadro FX 350M vs NVIDIA GeForce Go 7800 GTX
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro FX 350M and NVIDIA GeForce Go 7800 GTX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 350M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
- Around 2% higher core clock speed: 450 MHz vs 440 MHz
- Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 450 MHz vs 440 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 90 nm vs 110 nm
- 4.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 65 Watt
Launch date | 13 March 2006 vs 29 September 2005 |
Core clock speed | 450 MHz vs 440 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 450 MHz vs 440 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 90 nm vs 110 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 65 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce Go 7800 GTX
- 5.9x more texture fill rate: 10.56 GTexel / s vs 1.8 GTexel / s
- 6x more pipelines: 24 vs 4
- 2x more maximum memory size: 512 MB vs 256 MB
- Around 22% higher memory clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 900 MHz
- 4.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 210 vs 45
- Around 81% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 239 vs 132
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 10.56 GTexel / s vs 1.8 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 24 vs 4 |
Maximum memory size | 512 MB vs 256 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1100 MHz vs 900 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 210 vs 45 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 239 vs 132 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro FX 350M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce Go 7800 GTX
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro FX 350M | NVIDIA GeForce Go 7800 GTX |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 45 | 210 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 132 | 239 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 575 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 575 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro FX 350M | NVIDIA GeForce Go 7800 GTX | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Curie | Curie |
Code name | G72 | G70 |
Launch date | 13 March 2006 | 29 September 2005 |
Place in performance rating | 1191 | 1192 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 450 MHz | 440 MHz |
Core clock speed | 450 MHz | 440 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 90 nm | 110 nm |
Pipelines | 4 | 24 |
Texture fill rate | 1.8 GTexel / s | 10.56 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 65 Watt |
Transistor count | 112 million | 302 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 9.0c | 9.0c |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 35.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 350 Bit | 550 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 900 MHz | 1100 MHz |
Memory type | 64 | 256 |
Shared memory | no | 0 |
Technologies |
||
CineFX 4.0 | ||
Intellisample 4.0 | ||
PowerMizer 6.0 | ||
UltraShadow II |