NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M vs ATI FireGL V7100
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M and ATI FireGL V7100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- 2.6x more texture fill rate: 16 GTexel / s vs 6.084 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 65 nm vs 130 nm
- Around 30% lower typical power consumption: 70 Watt vs 91 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 512 MB vs 256 MB
- Around 54% higher memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 1040 MHz
- 6.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 467 vs 72
- Around 64% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 365 vs 223
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 23 February 2008 vs 1 December 2004 |
Texture fill rate | 16 GTexel / s vs 6.084 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm vs 130 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 70 Watt vs 91 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 512 MB vs 256 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz vs 1040 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 467 vs 72 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 365 vs 223 |
Reasons to consider the ATI FireGL V7100
- Around 1% higher core clock speed: 507 MHz vs 500 MHz
Core clock speed | 507 MHz vs 500 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M
GPU 2: ATI FireGL V7100
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M | ATI FireGL V7100 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 467 | 72 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 365 | 223 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1820 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1820 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M | ATI FireGL V7100 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla | R400 |
Code name | G92 | R480 |
Launch date | 23 February 2008 | 1 December 2004 |
Place in performance rating | 784 | 786 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $1,099 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 500 MHz | 507 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 160 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 130 nm |
Pipelines | 96 | |
Texture fill rate | 16 GTexel / s | 6.084 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 70 Watt | 91 Watt |
Transistor count | 754 million | 160 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-HE | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
Length | 211 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 9.0b |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 2.0 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 256 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 51.1 GB / s | 33.28 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 1040 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
Gigathread technology | ||
HDCP-capable | ||
HDR (High Dynamic-Range Lighting) | ||
PCI-E 16x | ||
PowerMizer 7.0 |