NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M and NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 91% higher core clock speed: 954 MHz vs 500 MHz
- 7.9x more texture fill rate: 127.1 GTexel / s vs 16 GTexel / s
- 16x more pipelines: 1536 vs 96
- 19.1x better floating-point performance: 3,050 gflops vs 160 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 65 nm
- 16x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 512 MB
- 8.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3783 vs 467
- Around 84% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 1820
- Around 84% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 1820
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 12 March 2014 vs 23 February 2008 |
| Core clock speed | 954 MHz vs 500 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 127.1 GTexel / s vs 16 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1536 vs 96 |
| Floating-point performance | 3,050 gflops vs 160 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 65 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 512 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3783 vs 467 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 1820 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 1820 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M
- Around 74% lower typical power consumption: 70 Watt vs 122 Watt
- Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 365 vs 332
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 70 Watt vs 122 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 365 vs 332 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M | NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3783 | 467 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 332 | 365 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 15023 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 34.42 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 776.776 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.915 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 36.688 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 82.511 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4501 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 1820 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4501 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 1820 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1611 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M | NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | Tesla |
| Code name | GK104 | G92 |
| Launch date | 12 March 2014 | 23 February 2008 |
| Place in performance rating | 780 | 783 |
| Type | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 993 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 954 MHz | 500 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 1536 | |
| Floating-point performance | 3,050 gflops | 160 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 65 nm |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 96 |
| Texture fill rate | 127.1 GTexel / s | 16 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 122 Watt | 70 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 754 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| 7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | ||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| HDCP content protection | ||
| HDMI | ||
| LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | ||
| VGA аnalog display support | Up to 2048x1536 | |
| HDCP | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | MXM-HE |
| Laptop size | large | large |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.0 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 512 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB / s | 51.1 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
| Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| BatteryBoost | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
| Gigathread technology | ||
| HDCP-capable | ||
| HDR (High Dynamic-Range Lighting) | ||
| PCI-E 16x | ||
| PowerMizer 7.0 | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 880M vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX Go1400
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 880M vs
ATIRadeon X550 XT
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 880M vs
ATIRadeon HD 2900 GT
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 880M vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 3600M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 880M vs
AMDRadeon HD 6970M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 880M vs
NVIDIATesla C2075
