NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M and NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 0 month(s) later
  • Around 91% higher core clock speed: 954 MHz vs 500 MHz
  • 7.9x more texture fill rate: 127.1 GTexel / s vs 16 GTexel / s
  • 16x more pipelines: 1536 vs 96
  • 19.1x better floating-point performance: 3,050 gflops vs 160 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 65 nm
  • 16x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 512 MB
  • 8.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3818 vs 467
  • Around 84% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 1820
  • Around 84% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 1820
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 12 March 2014 vs 23 February 2008
Core clock speed 954 MHz vs 500 MHz
Texture fill rate 127.1 GTexel / s vs 16 GTexel / s
Pipelines 1536 vs 96
Floating-point performance 3,050 gflops vs 160 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm vs 65 nm
Maximum memory size 8 GB vs 512 MB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 3818 vs 467
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3356 vs 1820
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3356 vs 1820

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M

  • Around 74% lower typical power consumption: 70 Watt vs 122 Watt
  • Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 365 vs 333
Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 70 Watt vs 122 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 365 vs 333

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
3818
467
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
333
365
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3356
1820
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3356
1820
Name NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M
PassMark - G3D Mark 3818 467
PassMark - G2D Mark 333 365
Geekbench - OpenCL 15023
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 46.273
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 777.677
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 3.914
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 38.196
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 82.511
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 4501
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3356 1820
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 4501
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3356 1820
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 1611

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M

Essentials

Architecture Kepler Tesla
Code name GK104 G92
Launch date 12 March 2014 23 February 2008
Place in performance rating 775 778
Type Laptop Mobile workstation

Technical info

Boost clock speed 993 MHz
Core clock speed 954 MHz 500 MHz
CUDA cores 1536
Floating-point performance 3,050 gflops 160 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 65 nm
Pipelines 1536 96
Texture fill rate 127.1 GTexel / s 16 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 122 Watt 70 Watt
Transistor count 3,540 million 754 million

Video outputs and ports

7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI
Display Connectors No outputs No outputs
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support Up to 3840x2160
eDP 1.2 signal support Up to 3840x2160
HDCP content protection
HDMI
LVDS signal support Up to 1920x1200
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming
VGA аnalog display support Up to 2048x1536
HDCP

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Bus support PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0
Interface MXM-B (3.0) MXM-HE
Laptop size large large
Supplementary power connectors None

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_0) 10.0
OpenCL 1.1
OpenGL 4.5 3.3

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 512 MB
Memory bandwidth 160.0 GB / s 51.1 GB / s
Memory bus width 256 Bit 256 Bit
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR3
Shared memory 0 0
Standard memory configuration GDDR5
Memory clock speed 1600 MHz

Technologies

3D Blu-Ray
BatteryBoost
CUDA
Direct Compute
FXAA
GeForce Experience
GeForce ShadowPlay
GPU Boost
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder
Optimus
SLI
TXAA
Gigathread technology
HDCP-capable
HDR (High Dynamic-Range Lighting)
PCI-E 16x
PowerMizer 7.0