NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 vs ATI Mobility Radeon X1450
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 and ATI Mobility Radeon X1450 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 370
- Videocard is newer: launch date 11 month(s) later
- Around 31% higher texture fill rate: 2.88 GTexel / s vs 2.2 GTexel / s
- 4x more pipelines: 16 vs 4
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 80 nm vs 90 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 256 MB vs 128 MB
- Around 11% higher memory clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 900 MHz
- 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 84 vs 33
- Around 88% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 385 vs 205
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 12 September 2007 vs 18 September 2006 |
Texture fill rate | 2.88 GTexel / s vs 2.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 16 vs 4 |
Manufacturing process technology | 80 nm vs 90 nm |
Maximum memory size | 256 MB vs 128 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 900 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 84 vs 33 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 385 vs 205 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon X1450
- Around 53% higher core clock speed: 550 MHz vs 360 MHz
Core clock speed | 550 MHz vs 360 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro FX 370
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon X1450
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 | ATI Mobility Radeon X1450 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 84 | 33 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 385 | 205 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 628 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 628 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 | ATI Mobility Radeon X1450 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla | R500 |
Code name | G84 | M64 |
Launch date | 12 September 2007 | 18 September 2006 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $129 | |
Place in performance rating | 864 | 856 |
Price now | $92.75 | |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Value for money (0-100) | 1.17 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 360 MHz | 550 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 23.04 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 80 nm | 90 nm |
Pipelines | 16 | 4 |
Texture fill rate | 2.88 GTexel / s | 2.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | |
Transistor count | 289 million | 107 million |
Boost clock speed | 550 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2x DVI | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Length | 198 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 9.0c |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 2.0 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | 128 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 8 GB / s | 14.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 450 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | 900 MHz |
Memory type | DDR2 | 128 |
Shared memory | 0 |