NVIDIA GeForce MX110 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 370

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX110 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

NVIDIA GeForce MX110

NVIDIA Quadro FX 370

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX110

Videocard is newer: launch date 10 year(s) 2 month(s) later
2.7x more core clock speed: 965 MHz vs 360 MHz
8.3x more texture fill rate: 23.83 GTexel / s vs 2.88 GTexel / s
16x more pipelines: 256 vs 16
33.1x better floating-point performance: 762.6 gflops vs 23.04 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 80 nm
Around 17% lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 35 Watt
8x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 256 MB
5x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 1000 MHz
16.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1417 vs 84
5.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3352 vs 628
5.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3352 vs 628

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	17 November 2017 vs 12 September 2007
Core clock speed	965 MHz vs 360 MHz
Texture fill rate	23.83 GTexel / s vs 2.88 GTexel / s
Pipelines	256 vs 16
Floating-point performance	762.6 gflops vs 23.04 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm vs 80 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	30 Watt vs 35 Watt
Maximum memory size	2 GB vs 256 MB
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz vs 1000 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	1417 vs 84
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3352 vs 628
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3352 vs 628

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 370

2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 385 vs 189

Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	385 vs 189

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX110
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 370

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1417

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

189

385

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3352

628

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3352

628

Name	NVIDIA GeForce MX110	NVIDIA Quadro FX 370
PassMark - G3D Mark	1417	84
PassMark - G2D Mark	189	385
Geekbench - OpenCL	4256
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	2197
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	2197
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3502
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3502
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3352	628
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3352	628

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce MX110	NVIDIA Quadro FX 370
Essentials
Architecture	Maxwell	Tesla
Code name	GM108	G84
Launch date	17 November 2017	12 September 2007
Place in performance rating	891	888
Type	Laptop	Workstation
Launch price (MSRP)		$129
Price now		$92.75
Value for money (0-100)		1.17
Technical info
Boost clock speed	993 MHz
Core clock speed	965 MHz	360 MHz
Floating-point performance	762.6 gflops	23.04 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	80 nm
Pipelines	256	16
Texture fill rate	23.83 GTexel / s	2.88 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	30 Watt	35 Watt
Transistor count		289 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	2x DVI
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 1.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
Length		198 mm
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_0)	10.0
OpenGL	4.6	3.3
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	256 MB
Memory bandwidth	40.1 GB / s	8 GB / s
Memory bus width	64 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz	1000 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5 / DDR3	DDR2
Shared memory	0
Technologies
3D Vision
3D Vision / 3DTV Play
CUDA
GameWorks
Optimus
Verde Drivers