NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 vs ATI Mobility Radeon X600
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 and ATI Mobility Radeon X600 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 370
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 80% higher texture fill rate: 2.88 GTexel / s vs 1.6 GTexel / s
- 4x more pipelines: 16 vs 4
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 80 nm vs 130 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 256 MB vs 128 MB
- 2x more memory clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 500 MHz
- Around 68% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 84 vs 50
- Around 84% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 385 vs 209
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 12 September 2007 vs 1 June 2004 |
| Texture fill rate | 2.88 GTexel / s vs 1.6 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 16 vs 4 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 80 nm vs 130 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 256 MB vs 128 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 500 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 84 vs 50 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 385 vs 209 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon X600
- Around 11% higher core clock speed: 400 MHz vs 360 MHz
| Core clock speed | 400 MHz vs 360 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro FX 370
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon X600
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 | ATI Mobility Radeon X600 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 84 | 50 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 385 | 209 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 628 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 628 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 | ATI Mobility Radeon X600 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Tesla | Rage 9 |
| Code name | G84 | M24 |
| Launch date | 12 September 2007 | 1 June 2004 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $129 | |
| Place in performance rating | 888 | 885 |
| Price now | $92.75 | |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 1.17 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 360 MHz | 400 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 23.04 gflops | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 80 nm | 130 nm |
| Pipelines | 16 | 4 |
| Texture fill rate | 2.88 GTexel / s | 1.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 289 million | 75 million |
| Boost clock speed | 400 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Length | 198 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 10.0 | 9.0b |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 2.0 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | 128 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 8 GB / s | 8 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 250 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | 500 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR2 | 128 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| PCIe | ||
