NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP vs NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GT
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP and NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 2% higher core clock speed: 550 MHz vs 540 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 80 nm
- Around 68% lower typical power consumption: 28 Watt vs 47 Watt
- 2.3x more memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 700 MHz
- Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 145 vs 131
- Around 69% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 71 vs 42
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 December 2009 vs 17 April 2007 |
Core clock speed | 550 MHz vs 540 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 80 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 28 Watt vs 47 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz vs 700 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 145 vs 131 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 71 vs 42 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GT
- Around 95% higher texture fill rate: 8.6 billion / sec vs 4.4 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 32 vs 16
- Around 73% better floating-point performance: 76.16 gflops vs 44 gflops
- Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1397 vs 1023
- Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1397 vs 1023
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 8.6 billion / sec vs 4.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 32 vs 16 |
Floating-point performance | 76.16 gflops vs 44 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1397 vs 1023 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1397 vs 1023 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GT
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP | NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GT |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 145 | 131 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 71 | 42 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1023 | 1397 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1023 | 1397 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2855 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 449 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 449 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP | NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GT | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Tesla |
Code name | GT218 | G84 |
Launch date | 1 December 2009 | 17 April 2007 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $169 | $159 |
Place in performance rating | 1616 | 1621 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 550 MHz | 540 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 44 gflops | 76.16 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 80 nm |
Pipelines | 16 | 32 |
Texture fill rate | 4.4 GTexel / s | 8.6 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 28 Watt | 47 Watt |
Transistor count | 260 million | 289 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Length | 168 mm | 170 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.1 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 12.8 GB / s | 22.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 700 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR3 |
Standard memory config per GPU | 256 MB | |
Technologies |
||
SLI |