NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP vs NVIDIA GeForce G102M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP and NVIDIA GeForce G102M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP

• Videocard is newer: launch date 10 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 90 nm
• 4x more memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 400 MHz
• Around 20% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 71 vs 59
• Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1023 vs 890
• Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1023 vs 890

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce G102M

• Around 82% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 550 MHz
• 2x lower typical power consumption: 14 Watt vs 28 Watt
• Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 168 vs 145

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce G102M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	145 168
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	71 59
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1023 890
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1023 890

Compare specifications (specs)