NVIDIA Quadro 400 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro 400 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 400
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 64% higher texture fill rate: 7.2 GTexel / s vs 4.4 GTexel / s
- 3x more pipelines: 48 vs 16
- 2.5x better floating-point performance: 108 gflops vs 44 gflops
- Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 148 vs 145
- Around 62% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4630 vs 2855
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1103 vs 1023
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1103 vs 1023
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 5 April 2011 vs 1 December 2009 |
Texture fill rate | 7.2 GTexel / s vs 4.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 48 vs 16 |
Floating-point performance | 108 gflops vs 44 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 148 vs 145 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4630 vs 2855 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1103 vs 1023 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1103 vs 1023 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP
- Around 22% higher core clock speed: 550 MHz vs 450 MHz
- Around 14% lower typical power consumption: 28 Watt vs 32 Watt
- Around 4% higher memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 1540 MHz
- Around 20% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 71 vs 59
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 550 MHz vs 450 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 28 Watt vs 32 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz vs 1540 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 71 vs 59 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro 400
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro 400 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 148 | 145 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 59 | 71 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4630 | 2855 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1103 | 1023 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1103 | 1023 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro 400 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | GT216 | GT218 |
Launch date | 5 April 2011 | 1 December 2009 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $169 | $169 |
Place in performance rating | 1607 | 1610 |
Price now | $145.55 | |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 2.13 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 450 MHz | 550 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 108 gflops | 44 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | 16 |
Texture fill rate | 7.2 GTexel / s | 4.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 32 Watt | 28 Watt |
Transistor count | 486 million | 260 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 163 mm | 168 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.1 | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 12.32 GB / s | 12.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1540 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR3 |