NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 and NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 5 month(s) later
• Around 14% higher texture fill rate: 38.4 GTexel / s vs 33.6 billion / sec
• Around 71% higher pipelines: 192 vs 112
• Around 38% better floating-point performance: 462.3 gflops vs 336.0 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 55 nm vs 65 nm
• 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
• Around 78% higher memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 900 MHz
• Around 66% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 799 vs 482

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT

• 2.5x more core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 600 MHz
• Around 3% lower typical power consumption: 105 Watt vs 108 Watt
• Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 61 vs 58
• Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3346 vs 3258
• Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3346 vs 3258

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	799 482
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	58 61
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3258 3346
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3258 3346

Compare specifications (specs)