Intel HD Graphics 4600 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 4600 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 4600
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 55 nm
- 2.4x lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 108 Watt
- 5.9x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 315 vs 53
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 3 June 2013 vs 30 March 2009 |
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm vs 55 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt vs 108 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 315 vs 53 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800
- Around 50% higher core clock speed: 600 MHz vs 400 MHz
- 7.7x more texture fill rate: 38.4 GTexel / s vs 5 GTexel / s
- 9.6x more pipelines: 192 vs 20
- 9.2x better floating-point performance: 462.3 gflops vs 50 gflops
- Around 31% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 824 vs 628
- 4.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 13337 vs 3220
- Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3258 vs 2808
- Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3258 vs 2808
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 600 MHz vs 400 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 38.4 GTexel / s vs 5 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 192 vs 20 |
Floating-point performance | 462.3 gflops vs 50 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 824 vs 628 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 13337 vs 3220 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3258 vs 2808 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3258 vs 2808 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 4600
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel HD Graphics 4600 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 628 | 824 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 315 | 53 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3220 | 13337 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.844 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 171.17 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.115 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 10.385 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 12.361 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 988 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1702 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2808 | 3258 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 988 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1702 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2808 | 3258 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 194 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel HD Graphics 4600 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 7.5 | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | Haswell GT2 | GT200B |
Launch date | 3 June 2013 | 30 March 2009 |
Place in performance rating | 1358 | 1361 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $799 | |
Price now | $109.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 9.89 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1250 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 400 MHz | 600 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 50 gflops | 462.3 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 20 | 192 |
Texture fill rate | 5 GTexel / s | 38.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | 108 Watt |
Transistor count | 392 million | 1,400 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 198 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.3 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB / s | |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |