NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M vs NVIDIA GeForce 7200 GS
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M and NVIDIA GeForce 7200 GS videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 50% higher core clock speed: 675 MHz vs 450 MHz
- 24x more texture fill rate: 43.2 GTexel / s vs 1.8 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 65 nm vs 90 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 128 MB
- 3x more memory clock speed: 2000 MHz vs 668 MHz
- 25x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 575 vs 23
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 14 August 2008 vs 18 January 2006 |
| Core clock speed | 675 MHz vs 450 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 43.2 GTexel / s vs 1.8 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm vs 90 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 128 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz vs 668 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 575 vs 23 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 7200 GS
- 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 98 vs 42
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 98 vs 42 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 7200 GS
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M | NVIDIA GeForce 7200 GS |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 575 | 23 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 42 | 98 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3272 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3272 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M | NVIDIA GeForce 7200 GS | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Tesla | Curie |
| Code name | G92 | G72 |
| Launch date | 14 August 2008 | 18 January 2006 |
| Place in performance rating | 1413 | 1416 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 675 MHz | 450 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 422.4 gflops | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 90 nm |
| Pipelines | 128 | |
| Texture fill rate | 43.2 GTexel / s | 1.8 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 754 million | 112 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 10.0 | 9.0c |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 128 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 64.0 GB / s | 5.34 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | 668 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | DDR2 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
| PowerMizer 8.0 | ||

