ATI FirePro V3800 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M

Comparative analysis of ATI FirePro V3800 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the ATI FirePro V3800

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 8 month(s) later
• 3.1x more pipelines: 400 vs 128
• Around 23% better floating-point performance: 520.0 gflops vs 422.4 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
• 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 43 Watt vs 100 Watt
• 3.9x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 179 vs 46

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M

• Around 4% higher core clock speed: 675 MHz vs 650 MHz
• 3.3x more texture fill rate: 43.2 GTexel / s vs 13 GTexel / s
• 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
• Around 11% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz vs 1800 MHz
• Around 83% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 586 vs 321
• Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3272 vs 2958
• Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3272 vs 2958

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: ATI FirePro V3800
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	321 586
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	179 46
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2958 3272
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2958 3272

Compare specifications (specs)