ATI FirePro V3800 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
Comparative analysis of ATI FirePro V3800 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the ATI FirePro V3800
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- 3.1x more pipelines: 400 vs 128
- Around 23% better floating-point performance: 520.0 gflops vs 422.4 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
- 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 43 Watt vs 100 Watt
- 3.9x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 179 vs 46
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 26 April 2010 vs 14 August 2008 |
Pipelines | 400 vs 128 |
Floating-point performance | 520.0 gflops vs 422.4 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 65 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 43 Watt vs 100 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 179 vs 46 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
- Around 4% higher core clock speed: 675 MHz vs 650 MHz
- 3.3x more texture fill rate: 43.2 GTexel / s vs 13 GTexel / s
- 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
- Around 11% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz vs 1800 MHz
- Around 83% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 586 vs 321
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3272 vs 2958
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3272 vs 2958
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 675 MHz vs 650 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 43.2 GTexel / s vs 13 GTexel / s |
Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 586 vs 321 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3272 vs 2958 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3272 vs 2958 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: ATI FirePro V3800
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | ATI FirePro V3800 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 321 | 586 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 179 | 46 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.432 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 153.019 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.29 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 10.314 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 48.552 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1572 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2958 | 3272 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1572 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2958 | 3272 |
Compare specifications (specs)
ATI FirePro V3800 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Tesla |
Code name | Redwood | G92 |
Launch date | 26 April 2010 | 14 August 2008 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $129 | |
Place in performance rating | 1405 | 1408 |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 650 MHz | 675 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 520.0 gflops | 422.4 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 400 | 128 |
Texture fill rate | 13 GTexel / s | 43.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 43 Watt | 100 Watt |
Transistor count | 627 million | 754 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Length | 168 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 64.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 2000 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
PowerMizer 8.0 |