NVIDIA Quadro FX 470 vs Intel GMA X3500
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro FX 470 and Intel GMA X3500 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 470
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 65 nm vs 90 nm
| Launch date | 12 September 2007 vs 1 August 2007 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm vs 90 nm |
Reasons to consider the Intel GMA X3500
- Around 15% higher core clock speed: 667 MHz vs 580 MHz
- 2.9x lower typical power consumption: 13 Watt vs 38 Watt
| Core clock speed | 667 MHz vs 580 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 13 Watt vs 38 Watt |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro FX 470 | Intel GMA X3500 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Tesla | Generation 4.0 |
| Code name | C79MX | Bearlake |
| Launch date | 12 September 2007 | 1 August 2007 |
| Place in performance rating | not rated | not rated |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 580 MHz | 667 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 90 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 38 Watt | 13 Watt |
| Transistor count | 314 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCI | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 10.0 | 9.0c |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 2.0 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro FX 470 with others
NVIDIAQuadro FX 470 vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition
NVIDIAQuadro FX 470 vs
IntelGMA X3500
NVIDIAQuadro FX 470 vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 570
