NVIDIA Quadro FX 580 vs NVIDIA GeForce 6600 GT
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro FX 580 and NVIDIA GeForce 6600 GT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 580
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 80% higher texture fill rate: 7.2 GTexel / s vs 4 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 55 nm vs 110 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 512 MB vs 256 MB
- Around 60% higher memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 161 vs 143
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 9 April 2009 vs 12 August 2004 |
Texture fill rate | 7.2 GTexel / s vs 4 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm vs 110 nm |
Maximum memory size | 512 MB vs 256 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 161 vs 143 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 6600 GT
- Around 11% higher core clock speed: 500 MHz vs 450 MHz
- Around 23% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 53 vs 43
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 500 MHz vs 450 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 53 vs 43 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro FX 580
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 6600 GT
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro FX 580 | NVIDIA GeForce 6600 GT |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 161 | 143 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 43 | 53 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1687 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1687 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro FX 580 | NVIDIA GeForce 6600 GT | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla | Curie |
Code name | G96C | NV43 A2 |
Launch date | 9 April 2009 | 12 August 2004 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $199 | $64.95 |
Place in performance rating | 1578 | 1581 |
Price now | $59.46 | $64.95 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 5.88 | 2.05 |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 450 MHz | 500 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 72 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 110 nm |
Pipelines | 32 | |
Texture fill rate | 7.2 GTexel / s | 4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt | |
Transistor count | 314 million | 146 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Length | 198 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 9.0c |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 256 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB / s | 16 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR3 |