NVIDIA GeForce GT 330M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 580
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 330M and NVIDIA Quadro FX 580 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 330M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
- Around 28% higher texture fill rate: 9.2 GTexel / s vs 7.2 GTexel / s
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 48 vs 32
- Around 69% better floating-point performance: 121.44 gflops vs 72 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 55 nm
- Around 74% lower typical power consumption: 23 Watt vs 40 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
- Around 34% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 216 vs 161
- Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1903 vs 1687
- Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1903 vs 1687
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 10 January 2010 vs 9 April 2009 |
Texture fill rate | 9.2 GTexel / s vs 7.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 48 vs 32 |
Floating-point performance | 121.44 gflops vs 72 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 55 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 23 Watt vs 40 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 512 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 216 vs 161 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1903 vs 1687 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1903 vs 1687 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 330M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 580
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 330M | NVIDIA Quadro FX 580 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 216 | 161 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 43 | 43 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5251 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1903 | 1687 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1903 | 1687 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 330M | NVIDIA Quadro FX 580 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Tesla |
Code name | GT216 | G96C |
Launch date | 10 January 2010 | 9 April 2009 |
Place in performance rating | 1577 | 1578 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $199 | |
Price now | $59.46 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 5.88 | |
Technical info |
||
CUDA cores | 48 | |
Floating-point performance | 121.44 gflops | 72 gflops |
Gigaflops | 182 | |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | 32 |
Texture fill rate | 9.2 GTexel / s | 7.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 23 Watt | 40 Watt |
Transistor count | 486 million | 314 million |
Core clock speed | 450 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | HDMIDual Link DVISingle Link DVIVGADisplayPort | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Length | 198 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.1 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB / s | 25.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory type | GDDR2, GDDR3, DDR3 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
HybridPower | ||
Power management | 8.0 | |
SLI |