NVIDIA Quadro GV100 vs AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro GV100 and AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

NVIDIA Quadro GV100

AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro GV100

Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 0 month(s) later
Around 26% higher core clock speed: 1132 MHz vs 900 MHz
Around 76% higher boost clock speed: 1628 MHz vs 925 MHz
7.8x more texture fill rate: 463.0 GTexel / s vs 59.2 GTexel / s
5x more pipelines: 5120 vs 1024
7.8x better floating-point performance: 14,817 gflops vs 1,894 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
16x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 2 GB
2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 143963 vs 70535
3.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19663 vs 6316
3.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19663 vs 6316

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	27 March 2018 vs 13 March 2015
Core clock speed	1132 MHz vs 900 MHz
Boost clock speed	1628 MHz vs 925 MHz
Texture fill rate	463.0 GTexel / s vs 59.2 GTexel / s
Pipelines	5120 vs 1024
Floating-point performance	14,817 gflops vs 1,894 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm vs 28 nm
Maximum memory size	32 GB vs 2 GB
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	143963 vs 70535
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	19663 vs 6316
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	19663 vs 6316

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP

Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 250 Watt
2.8x more memory clock speed: 4800 MHz vs 1696 MHz
2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8390 vs 3713
8.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 27566 vs 3357
2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8390 vs 3713
8.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 27566 vs 3357

Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	150 Watt vs 250 Watt
Memory clock speed	4800 MHz vs 1696 MHz
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	8390 vs 3713
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	27566 vs 3357
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	8390 vs 3713
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	27566 vs 3357

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro GV100
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

143963

70535

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

19663

6316

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3713

8390

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3357

27566

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

19663

6316

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3713

8390

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3357

27566

Name	NVIDIA Quadro GV100	AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP
PassMark - G3D Mark	19824
PassMark - G2D Mark	848
Geekbench - OpenCL	143963	70535
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	562.775
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	141.066
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	1964.377
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	19663	6316
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3713	8390
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3357	27566
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	19663	6316
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3713	8390
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3357	27566

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro GV100	AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP
Essentials
Architecture	Volta	GCN 1.0
Code name	GV100	Pitcairn
Launch date	27 March 2018	13 March 2015
Launch price (MSRP)	$8,999
Place in performance rating	93	170
Type	Workstation	Desktop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1628 MHz	925 MHz
Core clock speed	1132 MHz	900 MHz
Floating-point performance	14,817 gflops	1,894 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	5120	1024
Texture fill rate	463.0 GTexel / s	59.2 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	250 Watt	150 Watt
Transistor count	21,100 million	2,800 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	4x DisplayPort	2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	267 mm
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin	1x 6-pin
API support
DirectX	12.0 (12_1)	12.0 (11_1)
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	32 GB	2 GB
Memory bandwidth	870.4 GB / s	153.6 GB / s
Memory bus width	4096 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1696 MHz	4800 MHz
Memory type	HBM2	GDDR5