NVIDIA Quadro GV100 vs AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro GV100 and AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro GV100

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 0 month(s) later
  • Around 26% higher core clock speed: 1132 MHz vs 900 MHz
  • Around 76% higher boost clock speed: 1628 MHz vs 925 MHz
  • 7.8x more texture fill rate: 463.0 GTexel / s vs 59.2 GTexel / s
  • 5x more pipelines: 5120 vs 1024
  • 7.8x better floating-point performance: 14,817 gflops vs 1,894 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
  • 16x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 2 GB
  • 5.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 360276 vs 70535
  • 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19382 vs 6473
  • 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19382 vs 6473
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 27 March 2018 vs 13 March 2015
Core clock speed 1132 MHz vs 900 MHz
Boost clock speed 1628 MHz vs 925 MHz
Texture fill rate 463.0 GTexel / s vs 59.2 GTexel / s
Pipelines 5120 vs 1024
Floating-point performance 14,817 gflops vs 1,894 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm vs 28 nm
Maximum memory size 32 GB vs 2 GB
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 360276 vs 70535
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 19382 vs 6473
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 19382 vs 6473

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP

  • Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 250 Watt
  • 2.8x more memory clock speed: 4800 MHz vs 1696 MHz
  • 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8390 vs 3713
  • 8.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 27566 vs 3357
  • 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8390 vs 3713
  • 8.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 27566 vs 3357
Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 150 Watt vs 250 Watt
Memory clock speed 4800 MHz vs 1696 MHz
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 8390 vs 3713
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 27566 vs 3357
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 8390 vs 3713
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 27566 vs 3357

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro GV100
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP

Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
360276
70535
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
19382
6473
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3713
8390
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3357
27566
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
19382
6473
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3713
8390
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3357
27566
Name NVIDIA Quadro GV100 AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP
PassMark - G3D Mark 12727
PassMark - G2D Mark 799
Geekbench - OpenCL 360276 70535
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 562.775
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 141.066
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 1964.377
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 19382 6473
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3713 8390
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3357 27566
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 19382 6473
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3713 8390
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3357 27566

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Quadro GV100 AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP

Essentials

Architecture Volta GCN 1.0
Code name GV100 Pitcairn
Launch date 27 March 2018 13 March 2015
Launch price (MSRP) $8,999
Place in performance rating 9 10
Type Workstation Desktop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1628 MHz 925 MHz
Core clock speed 1132 MHz 900 MHz
Floating-point performance 14,817 gflops 1,894 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 5120 1024
Texture fill rate 463.0 GTexel / s 59.2 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 250 Watt 150 Watt
Transistor count 21,100 million 2,800 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 4x DisplayPort 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Length 267 mm
Supplementary power connectors 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin 1x 6-pin

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_1) 12.0 (11_1)
OpenGL 4.6 4.5

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 32 GB 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 870.4 GB / s 153.6 GB / s
Memory bus width 4096 Bit 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 1696 MHz 4800 MHz
Memory type HBM2 GDDR5