NVIDIA Quadro GV100 vs AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro GV100 and AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro GV100
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 26% higher core clock speed: 1132 MHz vs 900 MHz
- Around 76% higher boost clock speed: 1628 MHz vs 925 MHz
- 7.8x more texture fill rate: 463.0 GTexel / s vs 59.2 GTexel / s
- 5x more pipelines: 5120 vs 1024
- 7.8x better floating-point performance: 14,817 gflops vs 1,894 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- 16x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 2 GB
- 2.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 160720 vs 70535
- 3.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19663 vs 6316
- 3.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19663 vs 6316
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 March 2018 vs 13 March 2015 |
Core clock speed | 1132 MHz vs 900 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1628 MHz vs 925 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 463.0 GTexel / s vs 59.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 5120 vs 1024 |
Floating-point performance | 14,817 gflops vs 1,894 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 2 GB |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 160720 vs 70535 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19663 vs 6316 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19663 vs 6316 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP
- Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 250 Watt
- 2.8x more memory clock speed: 4800 MHz vs 1696 MHz
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8390 vs 3713
- 8.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 27566 vs 3357
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8390 vs 3713
- 8.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 27566 vs 3357
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 4800 MHz vs 1696 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8390 vs 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 27566 vs 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8390 vs 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 27566 vs 3357 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro GV100
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro GV100 | AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 20021 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 888 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 160720 | 70535 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 562.775 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 141.066 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1964.377 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19663 | 6316 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 | 8390 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 27566 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19663 | 6316 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 | 8390 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 27566 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro GV100 | AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Volta | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | GV100 | Pitcairn |
Launch date | 27 March 2018 | 13 March 2015 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $8,999 | |
Place in performance rating | 94 | 163 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1628 MHz | 925 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1132 MHz | 900 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 14,817 gflops | 1,894 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 5120 | 1024 |
Texture fill rate | 463.0 GTexel / s | 59.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 150 Watt |
Transistor count | 21,100 million | 2,800 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 870.4 GB / s | 153.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 4096 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1696 MHz | 4800 MHz |
Memory type | HBM2 | GDDR5 |