NVIDIA Quadro K3000M vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5450
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K3000M and ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5450 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K3000M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- 5.8x more texture fill rate: 31.39 GTexel / s vs 5.4 GTexel / s
- 7.2x more pipelines: 576 vs 80
- 7x better floating-point performance: 753.4 gflops vs 108 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 75% higher memory clock speed: 2800 MHz vs 1600 MHz
- 7.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1652 vs 214
- Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 341 vs 320
- 11.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 vs 299
- 11.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 vs 299
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 June 2012 vs 7 January 2010 |
Texture fill rate | 31.39 GTexel / s vs 5.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 576 vs 80 |
Floating-point performance | 753.4 gflops vs 108 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 2800 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1652 vs 214 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 341 vs 320 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 vs 299 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 vs 299 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5450
- Around 3% higher core clock speed: 675 MHz vs 654 MHz
- 6.8x lower typical power consumption: 11 Watt vs 75 Watt
Core clock speed | 675 MHz vs 654 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 11 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K3000M
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5450
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro K3000M | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5450 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1652 | 214 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 341 | 320 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4252 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.45 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 403.983 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.992 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.202 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 24.266 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2527 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3505 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 299 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2527 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3505 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 299 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro K3000M | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5450 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | GK104 | Park |
Launch date | 1 June 2012 | 7 January 2010 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $155 | |
Place in performance rating | 1007 | 1009 |
Price now | $155 | |
Type | Mobile workstation | Laptop |
Value for money (0-100) | 13.57 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 654 MHz | 675 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 753.4 gflops | 108 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 576 | 80 |
Texture fill rate | 31.39 GTexel / s | 5.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 11 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 292 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 89.6 GB / s | 12.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2800 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |