NVIDIA Quadro K3000M vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 150M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K3000M and NVIDIA Quadro NVS 150M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

NVIDIA Quadro K3000M

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 150M

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K3000M

Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 9 month(s) later
Around 23% higher core clock speed: 654 MHz vs 530 MHz
14.8x more texture fill rate: 31.39 GTexel / s vs 2.12 GTexel / s
72x more pipelines: 576 vs 8
36.2x better floating-point performance: 753.4 gflops vs 20.8 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 65 nm
8x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 256 MB
2x more memory clock speed: 2800 MHz vs 1400 MHz
23.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1652 vs 70
2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 341 vs 168

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	1 June 2012 vs 15 August 2008
Core clock speed	654 MHz vs 530 MHz
Texture fill rate	31.39 GTexel / s vs 2.12 GTexel / s
Pipelines	576 vs 8
Floating-point performance	753.4 gflops vs 20.8 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm vs 65 nm
Maximum memory size	2 GB vs 256 MB
Memory clock speed	2800 MHz vs 1400 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	1652 vs 70
PassMark - G2D Mark	341 vs 168

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro NVS 150M

7.5x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 75 Watt

Thermal Design Power (TDP)	10 Watt vs 75 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K3000M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro NVS 150M

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1652

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

341

168

Name	NVIDIA Quadro K3000M	NVIDIA Quadro NVS 150M
PassMark - G3D Mark	1652	70
PassMark - G2D Mark	341	168
Geekbench - OpenCL	4252
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	14.45
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	403.983
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.992
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	15.202
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	24.266
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	2527
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3505
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3353
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	2527
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3505
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3353

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro K3000M	NVIDIA Quadro NVS 150M
Essentials
Architecture	Kepler	Tesla
Code name	GK104	G98
Launch date	1 June 2012	15 August 2008
Launch price (MSRP)	$155
Place in performance rating	1007	1010
Price now	$155
Type	Mobile workstation	Mobile workstation
Value for money (0-100)	13.57
Technical info
Core clock speed	654 MHz	530 MHz
Floating-point performance	753.4 gflops	20.8 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	65 nm
Pipelines	576	8
Texture fill rate	31.39 GTexel / s	2.12 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	75 Watt	10 Watt
Transistor count	3,540 million	210 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	MXM-I
Laptop size	large
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_0)	10.0
OpenGL	4.6	3.3
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	256 MB
Memory bandwidth	89.6 GB / s	11.2 GB / s
Memory bus width	256 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	2800 MHz	1400 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR2, GDDR3
Shared memory	0	0