AMD Radeon R8 M445DX vs NVIDIA Quadro K3000M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R8 M445DX and NVIDIA Quadro K3000M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R8 M445DX
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 19% higher core clock speed: 780 MHz vs 654 MHz
- Around 22% higher pipelines: 704 vs 576
- 5.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 21666 vs 4252
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 15 May 2016 vs 1 June 2012 |
Core clock speed | 780 MHz vs 654 MHz |
Pipelines | 704 vs 576 |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 21666 vs 4252 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3353 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K3000M
- Around 77% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2527 vs 1427
- Around 77% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2527 vs 1427
- Around 88% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 341 vs 181
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1652 vs 797
- Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3505 vs 2636
- Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3505 vs 2636
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2527 vs 1427 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2527 vs 1427 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 341 vs 181 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1652 vs 797 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3505 vs 2636 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3505 vs 2636 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R8 M445DX
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K3000M
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R8 M445DX | NVIDIA Quadro K3000M |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1427 | 2527 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1427 | 2527 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 181 | 341 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 797 | 1652 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 21666 | 4252 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2636 | 3505 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2636 | 3505 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3353 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.45 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 403.983 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.992 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.202 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 24.266 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R8 M445DX | NVIDIA Quadro K3000M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Meso | GK104 |
Launch date | 15 May 2016 | 1 June 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 1006 | 1007 |
Type | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $155 | |
Price now | $155 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 13.57 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1021 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 780 MHz | 654 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 704 | 576 |
Transistor count | 3,100 million | 3,540 million |
Floating-point performance | 753.4 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 31.39 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | IGP | MXM-B (3.0) |
Laptop size | medium sized | large |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Memory bus width | 128 + 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory type | DDR4 / DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 89.6 GB / s | |
Memory clock speed | 2800 MHz |