NVIDIA Quadro K3000M vs ATI FirePro V7800

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K3000M and ATI FirePro V7800 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

NVIDIA Quadro K3000M

ATI FirePro V7800

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K3000M

Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 1 month(s) later
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
2x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 150 Watt
Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 338 vs 307
40.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2527 vs 63

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	1 June 2012 vs 26 April 2010
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm vs 40 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	75 Watt vs 150 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	338 vs 307
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	2527 vs 63

Reasons to consider the ATI FirePro V7800

Around 7% higher core clock speed: 700 MHz vs 654 MHz
Around 61% higher texture fill rate: 50.4 GTexel / s vs 31.39 GTexel / s
2.5x more pipelines: 1440 vs 576
2.7x better floating-point performance: 2,016.0 gflops vs 753.4 gflops
Around 43% higher memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 2800 MHz
Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2028 vs 1639
Around 16% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4894 vs 4211
Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 15.084 vs 14.45
2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1124.892 vs 403.983
Around 46% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.448 vs 0.992
2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 39.448 vs 15.202
7.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 181.538 vs 24.266
Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3721 vs 2527

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	700 MHz vs 654 MHz
Texture fill rate	50.4 GTexel / s vs 31.39 GTexel / s
Pipelines	1440 vs 576
Floating-point performance	2,016.0 gflops vs 753.4 gflops
Memory clock speed	4000 MHz vs 2800 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	2028 vs 1639
Geekbench - OpenCL	4894 vs 4211
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	15.084 vs 14.45
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1124.892 vs 403.983
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	1.448 vs 0.992
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	39.448 vs 15.202
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	181.538 vs 24.266
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	3721 vs 2527

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K3000M
GPU 2: ATI FirePro V7800

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1639

2028

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

338

307

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

4211

4894

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

14.45

15.084

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

403.983

1124.892

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

0.992

1.448

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

15.202

39.448

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

24.266

181.538

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2527

3721

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2527

Name	NVIDIA Quadro K3000M	ATI FirePro V7800
PassMark - G3D Mark	1639	2028
PassMark - G2D Mark	338	307
Geekbench - OpenCL	4211	4894
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	14.45	15.084
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	403.983	1124.892
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.992	1.448
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	15.202	39.448
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	24.266	181.538
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	2527	3721
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3505
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3353
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	2527	63
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3505
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3353

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro K3000M	ATI FirePro V7800
Essentials
Architecture	Kepler	TeraScale 2
Code name	GK104	Cypress
Launch date	1 June 2012	26 April 2010
Launch price (MSRP)	$155	$759
Place in performance rating	1031	1033
Price now	$155
Type	Mobile workstation	Workstation
Value for money (0-100)	13.57
Technical info
Core clock speed	654 MHz	700 MHz
Floating-point performance	753.4 gflops	2,016.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Pipelines	576	1440
Texture fill rate	31.39 GTexel / s	50.4 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	75 Watt	150 Watt
Transistor count	3,540 million	2,154 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	PCIe 2.0 x16
Laptop size	large
Length		254 mm
Supplementary power connectors		1x 6-pin
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_0)	11.2 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.6	4.4
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	2 GB
Memory bandwidth	89.6 GB / s	128.0 GB / s
Memory bus width	256 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	2800 MHz	4000 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Shared memory	0