NVIDIA Quadro K4000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 5600

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K4000 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 5600 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K4000

• Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 11 month(s) later
• Around 35% higher core clock speed: 810 MHz vs 600 MHz
• 2.7x more texture fill rate: 51.84 GTexel / s vs 19.2 GTexel / s
• 6x more pipelines: 768 vs 128
• 3.6x better floating-point performance: 1,244 gflops vs 345.6 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 90 nm
• 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 171 Watt
• 2x more maximum memory size: 3 GB vs 1536 MB
• 3.5x more memory clock speed: 5616 MHz vs 1600 MHz
• 5.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2721 vs 525
• 3.9x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 424 vs 109

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 5600

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K4000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 5600

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2721 525
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	424 109
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3321 3328
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3321 3328

Compare specifications (specs)