NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs NVIDIA Quadro K5000 Mac Edition
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K4200 and NVIDIA Quadro K5000 Mac Edition videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K4200
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 9% higher core clock speed: 771 MHz vs 706 MHz
- Around 13% lower typical power consumption: 108 Watt vs 122 Watt
| Launch date | 22 July 2014 vs 7 August 2012 |
| Core clock speed | 771 MHz vs 706 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 108 Watt vs 122 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K5000 Mac Edition
- Around 3% higher texture fill rate: 90.37 GTexel / s vs 87.81 GTexel / s
- Around 14% higher pipelines: 1536 vs 1344
- Around 3% better floating-point performance: 2,169 gflops vs 2,107 gflops
| Texture fill rate | 90.37 GTexel / s vs 87.81 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1536 vs 1344 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,169 gflops vs 2,107 gflops |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K4200
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K5000 Mac Edition
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro K4200 | NVIDIA Quadro K5000 Mac Edition |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4340 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 498 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 12321 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 33.016 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 736.063 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.73 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 31.588 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 70.194 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6373 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3382 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3311 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6373 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3382 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3311 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro K4200 | NVIDIA Quadro K5000 Mac Edition | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
| Code name | GK104 | GK104 |
| Launch date | 22 July 2014 | 7 August 2012 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $854.99 | $2,249 |
| Place in performance rating | 681 | not rated |
| Price now | $446.99 | |
| Type | Workstation | Workstation |
| Value for money (0-100) | 11.92 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 784 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 771 MHz | 706 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 2,107 gflops | 2,169 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 1344 | 1536 |
| Texture fill rate | 87.81 GTexel / s | 90.37 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 108 Watt | 122 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 3,540 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 241 mm | 267 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 172.8 GB / s | 172.8 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5400 MHz | 5400 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
