AMD Radeon Pro 455 vs NVIDIA Quadro K4200

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 455 and NVIDIA Quadro K4200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

AMD Radeon Pro 455

NVIDIA Quadro K4200

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 455

Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 3 month(s) later
Around 11% higher core clock speed: 855 MHz vs 771 MHz
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
3.1x lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 108 Watt
Around 39% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 705 vs 508
Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 33.484 vs 33.016
Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.854 vs 2.73
Around 42% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 44.793 vs 31.588
2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 148.673 vs 70.194
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 3311
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 3311

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	30 October 2016 vs 22 July 2014
Core clock speed	855 MHz vs 771 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	35 Watt vs 108 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	705 vs 508
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	33.484 vs 33.016
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	2.854 vs 2.73
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	44.793 vs 31.588
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	148.673 vs 70.194
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3359 vs 3311
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3359 vs 3311

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K4200

2.1x more texture fill rate: 87.81 GTexel / s vs 41.04 GTexel / s
Around 75% higher pipelines: 1344 vs 768
Around 60% better floating-point performance: 2,107 gflops vs 1,313 gflops
2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
Around 6% higher memory clock speed: 5400 MHz vs 5080 MHz
Around 39% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4325 vs 3113
Around 8% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 12186 vs 11291
Around 28% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 736.063 vs 573.646
Around 54% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6373 vs 4146
Around 92% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3382 vs 1762
Around 54% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6373 vs 4146
Around 92% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3382 vs 1762

Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate	87.81 GTexel / s vs 41.04 GTexel / s
Pipelines	1344 vs 768
Floating-point performance	2,107 gflops vs 1,313 gflops
Maximum memory size	4 GB vs 2 GB
Memory clock speed	5400 MHz vs 5080 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	4325 vs 3113
Geekbench - OpenCL	12186 vs 11291
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	736.063 vs 573.646
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	6373 vs 4146
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3382 vs 1762
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	6373 vs 4146
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3382 vs 1762

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 455
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K4200

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

3113

4325

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

705

508

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

11291

12186

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

33.484

33.016

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

573.646

736.063

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2.854

2.73

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

44.793

31.588

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

148.673

70.194

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

4146

6373

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1762

3382

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3359

3311

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

4146

6373

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1762

3382

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3359

3311

Name	AMD Radeon Pro 455	NVIDIA Quadro K4200
PassMark - G3D Mark	3113	4325
PassMark - G2D Mark	705	508
Geekbench - OpenCL	11291	12186
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	33.484	33.016
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	573.646	736.063
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	2.854	2.73
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	44.793	31.588
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	148.673	70.194
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	4146	6373
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1762	3382
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3359	3311
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	4146	6373
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1762	3382
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3359	3311
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		0

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon Pro 455	NVIDIA Quadro K4200
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 4.0	Kepler
Code name	Baffin	GK104
Launch date	30 October 2016	22 July 2014
Place in performance rating	671	684
Type	Mobile workstation	Workstation
Launch price (MSRP)		$854.99
Price now		$446.99
Value for money (0-100)		11.92
Technical info
Core clock speed	855 MHz	771 MHz
Floating-point performance	1,313 gflops	2,107 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	768	1344
Texture fill rate	41.04 GTexel / s	87.81 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	35 Watt	108 Watt
Transistor count	3,000 million	3,540 million
Boost clock speed		784 MHz
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 2.0 x16
Laptop size	large
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 6-pin
Length		241 mm
API support
DirectX	12.0 (12_0)	12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Memory bandwidth	81.28 GB / s	172.8 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	5080 MHz	5400 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Shared memory	0
Technologies
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready
FreeSync
HDMI 2.0