NVIDIA Quadro M600M vs NVIDIA Quadro K4200

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro M600M and NVIDIA Quadro K4200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA Quadro M600M

NVIDIA Quadro K4200

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M600M

Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
Around 33% higher core clock speed: 1029 MHz vs 771 MHz
Around 43% higher boost clock speed: 1124 MHz vs 784 MHz
3.6x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 108 Watt
Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3681 vs 3382
Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3681 vs 3382
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 3311
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 3311

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	18 August 2015 vs 22 July 2014
Core clock speed	1029 MHz vs 771 MHz
Boost clock speed	1124 MHz vs 784 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	30 Watt vs 108 Watt
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3681 vs 3382
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3681 vs 3382
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3359 vs 3311
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3359 vs 3311

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K4200

4.9x more texture fill rate: 87.81 GTexel / s vs 17.98 GTexel / s
3.5x more pipelines: 1344 vs 384
2.4x better floating-point performance: 2,107 gflops vs 863.2 gflops
2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
Around 8% higher memory clock speed: 5400 MHz vs 5012 MHz
Around 99% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4331 vs 2171
Around 49% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 502 vs 337
2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 12186 vs 5983
2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6373 vs 2945
2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6373 vs 2945

Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate	87.81 GTexel / s vs 17.98 GTexel / s
Pipelines	1344 vs 384
Floating-point performance	2,107 gflops vs 863.2 gflops
Maximum memory size	4 GB vs 2 GB
Memory clock speed	5400 MHz vs 5012 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	4331 vs 2171
PassMark - G2D Mark	502 vs 337
Geekbench - OpenCL	12186 vs 5983
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	6373 vs 2945
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	6373 vs 2945

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M600M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K4200

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

2171

4331

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

337

502

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

5983

12186

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2945

6373

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2945

6373

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3681

3382

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3681

3382

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3359

3311

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3359

3311

Name	NVIDIA Quadro M600M	NVIDIA Quadro K4200
PassMark - G3D Mark	2171	4331
PassMark - G2D Mark	337	502
Geekbench - OpenCL	5983	12186
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	2945	6373
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	2945	6373
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3681	3382
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3681	3382
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3359	3311
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3359	3311
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		33.016
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		736.063
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		2.73
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		31.588
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		70.194
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		0

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro M600M	NVIDIA Quadro K4200
Essentials
Architecture	Maxwell	Kepler
Code name	GM107	GK104
Launch date	18 August 2015	22 July 2014
Place in performance rating	694	695
Type	Mobile workstation	Workstation
Launch price (MSRP)		$854.99
Price now		$446.99
Value for money (0-100)		11.92
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1124 MHz	784 MHz
Core clock speed	1029 MHz	771 MHz
Floating-point performance	863.2 gflops	2,107 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	384	1344
Texture fill rate	17.98 GTexel / s	87.81 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	30 Watt	108 Watt
Transistor count	1,870 million	3,540 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
Display Port	1.2
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	PCIe 2.0 x16
Laptop size	large
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 6-pin
Length		241 mm
API support
DirectX	12	12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
Shader Model	5.0
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Memory bandwidth	80 GB / s	172.8 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz	5400 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Shared memory	0
Technologies
3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Display Management
Optimus