NVIDIA Quadro K620M vs AMD Radeon R6 Graphics

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K620M and AMD Radeon R6 Graphics videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s).

NVIDIA Quadro K620M

AMD Radeon R6 Graphics

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K620M

Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
Around 93% higher core clock speed: 1029 MHz vs 533 MHz
Around 87% higher boost clock speed: 1124 MHz vs 600 MHz
Around 14% higher texture fill rate: 17.98 GTexel / s vs 15.72 GTexel / s
Around 72% better floating-point performance: 863.2 gflops vs 503.0 gflops
Around 88% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1163 vs 617
Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 157 vs 138
Around 47% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5974 vs 4077
2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 23.872 vs 11.201
2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 91.813 vs 45.165
Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1291 vs 860
Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1291 vs 860

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	1 March 2015 vs 17 September 2014
Core clock speed	1029 MHz vs 533 MHz
Boost clock speed	1124 MHz vs 600 MHz
Texture fill rate	17.98 GTexel / s vs 15.72 GTexel / s
Floating-point performance	863.2 gflops vs 503.0 gflops
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	1163 vs 617
PassMark - G2D Mark	157 vs 138
Geekbench - OpenCL	5974 vs 4077
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	23.872 vs 11.201
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	91.813 vs 45.165
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1291 vs 860
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1291 vs 860

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R6 Graphics

2x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 30 Watt
Around 35% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 224.132 vs 165.904
Around 92% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1784 vs 927
2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3182 vs 1349
Around 92% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1784 vs 927
2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3182 vs 1349

Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt vs 30 Watt
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	224.132 vs 165.904
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1784 vs 927
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3182 vs 1349
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1784 vs 927
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3182 vs 1349

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K620M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R6 Graphics

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1163

617

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

157

138

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

5974

4077

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

23.872

11.201

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

165.904

224.132

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

91.813

45.165

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1291

860

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

927

1784

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1349

3182

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1291

860

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

927

1784

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1349

3182

Name	NVIDIA Quadro K620M	AMD Radeon R6 Graphics
PassMark - G3D Mark	1163	617
PassMark - G2D Mark	157	138
Geekbench - OpenCL	5974	4077
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	23.872	11.201
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	165.904	224.132
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	91.813	45.165
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1291	860
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	927	1784
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	1349	3182
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1291	860
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	927	1784
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	1349	3182
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		0.942
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		19.267

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro K620M	AMD Radeon R6 Graphics
Essentials
Architecture	Maxwell	GCN 2.0
Code name	GM108	Spectre
Launch date	1 March 2015	17 September 2014
Place in performance rating	1414	1415
Type	Mobile workstation	Desktop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1124 MHz	600 MHz
Core clock speed	1029 MHz	533 MHz
Floating-point performance	863.2 gflops	503.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	384	384
Texture fill rate	17.98 GTexel / s	15.72 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	30 Watt	15 Watt
Transistor count		2,410 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Display Port	1.2
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	IGP
Supplementary power connectors	None
API support
DirectX	12	12.0 (12_0)
OpenGL	4.5	4.5
Shader Model	5
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB
Memory bandwidth	14.4 GB / s
Memory bus width	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	1800 MHz
Memory type	DDR3	System Shared
Shared memory	0
Technologies
3D Vision
3D Vision / 3DTV Play
CUDA
nView Display Management
Optimus