Intel UHD Graphics 615 vs NVIDIA Quadro K620M

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 615 and NVIDIA Quadro K620M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 615

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 8 month(s) later
• 1401.6x more texture fill rate: 25.2 GTexel/s vs 17.98 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 6x lower typical power consumption: 5 Watt vs 30 Watt
• 8x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 2 GB
• Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 180 vs 157
• Around 33% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 221.42 vs 165.904
• Around 86% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1720 vs 927
• Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1772 vs 1349
• Around 86% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1720 vs 927
• Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1772 vs 1349

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K620M

• 3.4x more core clock speed: 1029 MHz vs 300 MHz
• Around 7% higher boost clock speed: 1124 MHz vs 1050 MHz
• 16x more pipelines: 384 vs 24
• 2.1x better floating-point performance: 863.2 gflops vs 403.2 gflops
• Around 60% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1163 vs 728
• Around 85% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5974 vs 3227
• Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 23.872 vs 18.422
• 4.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 91.813 vs 18.909
• Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1291 vs 1256
• Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1291 vs 1256

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 615
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K620M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	728 1163
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	180 157
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	3227 5974
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	18.422 23.872
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	221.42 165.904
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	18.909 91.813
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1256 1291
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1720 927
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1772 1349
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1256 1291
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1720 927
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1772 1349

Compare specifications (specs)