NVIDIA Quadro K620M vs AMD FirePro S4000X
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K620M and AMD FirePro S4000X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K620M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
- Around 42% higher core clock speed: 1029 MHz vs 725 MHz
- Around 45% higher boost clock speed: 1124 MHz vs 775 MHz
- Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 45 Watt
- Around 25% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 23.872 vs 19.089
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 March 2015 vs 7 August 2014 |
Core clock speed | 1029 MHz vs 725 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1124 MHz vs 775 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 45 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 23.872 vs 19.089 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro S4000X
- Around 72% higher texture fill rate: 31 GTexel / s vs 17.98 GTexel / s
- Around 67% higher pipelines: 640 vs 384
- Around 15% better floating-point performance: 992.0 gflops vs 863.2 gflops
- 2.5x more memory clock speed: 4500 MHz vs 1800 MHz
- 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 478.725 vs 165.904
- Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 92.567 vs 91.813
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 31 GTexel / s vs 17.98 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 640 vs 384 |
Floating-point performance | 992.0 gflops vs 863.2 gflops |
Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 478.725 vs 165.904 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 92.567 vs 91.813 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K620M
GPU 2: AMD FirePro S4000X
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro K620M | AMD FirePro S4000X |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1165 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 158 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4583 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 23.872 | 19.089 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 165.904 | 478.725 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 91.813 | 92.567 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1291 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 927 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1349 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1291 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 927 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1349 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.08 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 34.934 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro K620M | AMD FirePro S4000X | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | GM108 | Venus |
Launch date | 1 March 2015 | 7 August 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 1430 | 1431 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1124 MHz | 775 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1029 MHz | 725 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 863.2 gflops | 992.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 640 |
Texture fill rate | 17.98 GTexel / s | 31 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 45 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,500 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Form factor | MXM-A | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 5 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 72 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 4500 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
CUDA | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus |