NVIDIA Quadro M3000M vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 565v

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro M3000M and ATI Mobility Radeon HD 565v videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

NVIDIA Quadro M3000M

ATI Mobility Radeon HD 565v

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M3000M

Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 3 month(s) later
Around 56% higher core clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 675 MHz
3.1x more texture fill rate: 67.2 GTexel / s vs 21.6 GTexel / s
3.2x more pipelines: 1,024 vs 320
5x better floating-point performance: 2,150 gflops vs 432.0 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 55 nm
4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
3.1x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 1600 MHz
15.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5620 vs 353
Around 31% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 416 vs 318

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	18 August 2015 vs 5 May 2010
Core clock speed	1050 MHz vs 675 MHz
Texture fill rate	67.2 GTexel / s vs 21.6 GTexel / s
Pipelines	1,024 vs 320
Floating-point performance	2,150 gflops vs 432.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm vs 55 nm
Maximum memory size	4 GB vs 1 GB
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz vs 1600 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	5620 vs 353
PassMark - G2D Mark	416 vs 318

Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 565v

3.8x lower typical power consumption: 20 Watt vs 75 Watt

Thermal Design Power (TDP)	20 Watt vs 75 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 565v

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

5620

353

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

416

318

Name	NVIDIA Quadro M3000M	ATI Mobility Radeon HD 565v
PassMark - G3D Mark	5620	353
PassMark - G2D Mark	416	318
Geekbench - OpenCL	16630
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	82.563
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1266.506
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	4.91
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	70.779
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	252.607
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	7779
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3720
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3360
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	7779
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3720
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3360

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro M3000M	ATI Mobility Radeon HD 565v
Essentials
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0	TeraScale
Code name	GM204	M96
Launch date	18 August 2015	5 May 2010
Place in performance rating	498	500
Type	Mobile workstation	Laptop
Technical info
Core clock speed	1050 MHz	675 MHz
Floating-point performance	2,150 gflops	432.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	55 nm
Pipelines	1,024	320
Texture fill rate	67.2 GTexel / s	21.6 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	75 Watt	20 Watt
Transistor count	5,200 million	514 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Display Port	1.2
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Laptop size	large	medium sized
Supplementary power connectors	None
API support
DirectX	12	10.1
OpenGL	4.5	3.3
Shader Model	5.0
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	1 GB
Memory bandwidth	160 GB / s	25.6 GB / s
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz	1600 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR3, DDR3, DDR2
Shared memory	0	0
Technologies
3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Display Management
Optimus