AMD Radeon Pro WX 4130 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro WX 4130 Mobile and NVIDIA Quadro M3000M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 4130 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 75 Watt
- Around 20% higher memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 5012 MHz
Launch date | 1 March 2017 vs 18 August 2015 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz vs 5012 MHz |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
- Around 5% higher core clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 1002 MHz
- Around 60% higher texture fill rate: 67.2 GTexel / s vs 42.12 GTexel / s
- Around 60% higher pipelines: 1,024 vs 640
- Around 59% better floating-point performance: 2,150 gflops vs 1,348 gflops
- Around 27% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 418 vs 329
- 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5650 vs 2318
- 2.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 16615 vs 7209
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7779 vs 5180
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7779 vs 5180
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1050 MHz vs 1002 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 67.2 GTexel / s vs 42.12 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1,024 vs 640 |
Floating-point performance | 2,150 gflops vs 1,348 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 418 vs 329 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5650 vs 2318 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 16615 vs 7209 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7779 vs 5180 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7779 vs 5180 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro WX 4130 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro WX 4130 Mobile | NVIDIA Quadro M3000M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 329 | 418 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2318 | 5650 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7209 | 16615 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5180 | 7779 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5180 | 7779 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 82.563 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1266.506 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.91 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 70.779 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 252.607 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro WX 4130 Mobile | NVIDIA Quadro M3000M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | Baffin | GM204 |
Launch date | 1 March 2017 | 18 August 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 493 | 494 |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1053 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1002 MHz | 1050 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,348 gflops | 2,150 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 640 | 1,024 |
Texture fill rate | 42.12 GTexel / s | 67.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,000 million | 5,200 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 5.0 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 112.0 GB / s | 160 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus |