AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo vs NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo and NVIDIA Quadro M3000M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 71% higher core clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1050 MHz
- 7053.6x more texture fill rate: 474.0 GTexel/s vs 67.2 GTexel / s
- 3.8x more pipelines: 3840 vs 1,024
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 28 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 4 GB
- 7.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 125290 vs 16611
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 3 Aug 2021 vs 18 August 2015 |
| Core clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 1050 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 474.0 GTexel/s vs 67.2 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 3840 vs 1,024 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 28 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 4 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 125290 vs 16611 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
- 5.3x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 400 Watt
- 2.5x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective)
- Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3720 vs 2786
- Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3720 vs 2786
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3360 vs 2243
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3360 vs 2243
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 400 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 vs 2786 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 vs 2786 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 vs 2243 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 vs 2243 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo | NVIDIA Quadro M3000M |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2786 | 3720 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2786 | 3720 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2243 | 3360 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2243 | 3360 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 125290 | 16611 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5638 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 415 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 82.563 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1266.506 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.91 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 70.779 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 252.607 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7779 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7779 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo | NVIDIA Quadro M3000M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Code name | Navi 21 | GM204 |
| Launch date | 3 Aug 2021 | 18 August 2015 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $4999 | |
| Place in performance rating | 503 | 504 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1975 MHz | |
| Compute units | 60 | |
| Core clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1050 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 948.0 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 30.34 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 15.17 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 3840 | 1,024 |
| Pixel fill rate | 189.6 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 474.0 GTexel/s | 67.2 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 400 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Transistor count | 26800 million | 5,200 million |
| Floating-point performance | 2,150 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 4x Thunderbolt | No outputs |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 800 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Width | Quad-slot | |
| Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12 |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 5.0 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 512 GB/s | 160 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | 5012 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision Pro | ||
| Mosaic | ||
| nView Display Management | ||
| Optimus | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo with others
AMDRadeon Pro W6800X Duo vs
ATIFireGL V7300
AMDRadeon Pro W6800X Duo vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 550
AMDRadeon Pro W6800X Duo vs
AMDRadeon HD 7970
AMDRadeon Pro W6800X Duo vs
NVIDIAGeForce 720A
AMDRadeon Pro W6800X Duo vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 960
AMDRadeon Pro W6800X Duo vs
NVIDIAQuadro M3000M
