NVIDIA Quadro M4000 vs AMD FirePro M6000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro M4000 and AMD FirePro M6000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M4000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- 2.5x more texture fill rate: 80.39 GTexel / s vs 32 GTexel / s
- 2.6x more pipelines: 1664 vs 640
- 2.5x better floating-point performance: 2,573 gflops vs 1,024 gflops
- 4x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 50% higher memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 4000 MHz
- 3.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6675 vs 1820
- 2.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 18372 vs 8095
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6291 vs 3024
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3685 vs 1832
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6291 vs 3024
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3685 vs 1832
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 29 June 2015 vs 1 July 2012 |
Texture fill rate | 80.39 GTexel / s vs 32 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1664 vs 640 |
Floating-point performance | 2,573 gflops vs 1,024 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz vs 4000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6675 vs 1820 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 18372 vs 8095 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6291 vs 3024 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3685 vs 1832 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6291 vs 3024 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3685 vs 1832 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro M6000
- Around 3% higher core clock speed: 800 MHz vs 773 MHz
- 2.8x lower typical power consumption: 43 Watt vs 120 Watt
- Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 776 vs 669
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 3332
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 3332
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 800 MHz vs 773 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 43 Watt vs 120 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 776 vs 669 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 3332 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 3332 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M4000
GPU 2: AMD FirePro M6000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro M4000 | AMD FirePro M6000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6675 | 1820 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 669 | 776 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 18372 | 8095 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 65.548 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 732.046 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.453 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 17.725 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 217.357 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6291 | 3024 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3685 | 1832 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3332 | 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6291 | 3024 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3685 | 1832 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3332 | 3357 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 689 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro M4000 | AMD FirePro M6000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | GM204 | Heathrow |
Launch date | 29 June 2015 | 1 July 2012 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $791 | |
Place in performance rating | 537 | 538 |
Price now | $765.93 | |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 10.68 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 773 MHz | 800 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2,573 gflops | 1,024 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 1664 | 640 |
Texture fill rate | 80.39 GTexel / s | 32 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 43 Watt |
Transistor count | 5,200 million | 1,500 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort, DP DP DP DP 3-pin Stereo | No outputs |
Multi-display synchronization | Quadro Sync | |
Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
StereoOutput3D | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Length | 241 mm | |
SLI options | 1 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1 x 6-pin | None |
Width | 1" (2.5 cm) | |
Bus support | n / a | |
Form factor | MXM-B | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | 4000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB / s | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision Pro | ||
High-Performance Video I/O6 | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Desktop Management |