NVIDIA Quadro M4000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K5200
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro M4000 and NVIDIA Quadro K5200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M4000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 11 month(s) later
- Around 16% higher core clock speed: 773 MHz vs 667 MHz
- Around 25% lower typical power consumption: 120 Watt vs 150 Watt
- Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6680 vs 6135
- Around 22% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 673 vs 553
- Around 39% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 65.548 vs 47.147
- Around 36% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.453 vs 3.996
- Around 89% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 217.357 vs 115.307
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6291 vs 5946
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6291 vs 5946
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 29 June 2015 vs 22 July 2014 |
| Core clock speed | 773 MHz vs 667 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt vs 150 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6680 vs 6135 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 673 vs 553 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 65.548 vs 47.147 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.453 vs 3.996 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 217.357 vs 115.307 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6291 vs 5946 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6291 vs 5946 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K5200
- Around 84% higher texture fill rate: 148.0 GTexel / s vs 80.39 GTexel / s
- Around 38% higher pipelines: 2304 vs 1664
- Around 38% better floating-point performance: 3,553 gflops vs 2,573 gflops
- Around 5% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 19220 vs 18372
- Around 75% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1278.433 vs 732.046
- 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 50.08 vs 17.725
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3708 vs 3685
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 vs 3332
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3708 vs 3685
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 vs 3332
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 148.0 GTexel / s vs 80.39 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2304 vs 1664 |
| Floating-point performance | 3,553 gflops vs 2,573 gflops |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 19220 vs 18372 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1278.433 vs 732.046 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 50.08 vs 17.725 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 vs 3685 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 vs 3332 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 vs 3685 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 vs 3332 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M4000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K5200
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro M4000 | NVIDIA Quadro K5200 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6680 | 6135 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 673 | 553 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 18372 | 19220 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 65.548 | 47.147 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 732.046 | 1278.433 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.453 | 3.996 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 17.725 | 50.08 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 217.357 | 115.307 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6291 | 5946 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3685 | 3708 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3332 | 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6291 | 5946 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3685 | 3708 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3332 | 3353 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 680 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro M4000 | NVIDIA Quadro K5200 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | GM204 | GK110B |
| Launch date | 29 June 2015 | 22 July 2014 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $791 | $1,699.74 |
| Place in performance rating | 534 | 535 |
| Price now | $765.93 | $523.66 |
| Type | Workstation | Workstation |
| Value for money (0-100) | 10.68 | 14.51 |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 773 MHz | 667 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 2,573 gflops | 3,553 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 1664 | 2304 |
| Texture fill rate | 80.39 GTexel / s | 148.0 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Transistor count | 5,200 million | 7,080 million |
| Boost clock speed | 771 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort, DP DP DP DP 3-pin Stereo | 2x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
| Multi-display synchronization | Quadro Sync | |
| Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 241 mm | 267 mm |
| SLI options | 1 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1 x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin |
| Width | 1" (2.5 cm) | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | 6008 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory bandwidth | 192.3 GB / s | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision Pro | ||
| High-Performance Video I/O6 | ||
| Mosaic | ||
| nView Desktop Management | ||
